Teams

GEPTA/18&over/3.0W/Delgado/EPTC#4

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

18 players · average NTRP 2.91 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-12Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHilda Gonzales / Myrna Dominguez vs Michele Zerah / Leidiana Baca3-6, 0-6
2025-10-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMaria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia / Myrna Dominguez vs Mara Talamantes / Norma Alvarado3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Camila Olmos
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.15
Daniela Baylon
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.98
Ida Santillan
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3
2.91
Alexa Lopez
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.88
Diana Fonseca
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.85
Cristal Alvarez
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.81
Brenda Campos Chacon
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published 3
2.78
Dania Cuellar
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3
Dimna Arias
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
CARMEN LEMUS
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 2.5
Hilda Gonzales
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Laura Akemi Aizawa
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lilian Quinones
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Mara Culebro
usually #2 Doubles 69%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Myrna Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sofia de Santiago
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #2 Singles 23% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lilian Quinones + Cristal Alvarez8553% gamesnot enough data
Diana Fonseca + Sofia de Santiago7260% gamesnot enough data
Dania Cuellar + CARMEN LEMUS3258% gamesnot enough data
Dania Cuellar + Cristal Alvarez224 matchesnot enough data
Dimna Arias + Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia224 matchesnot enough data
Ida Santillan + Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia314 matchesnot enough data
Daniela Baylon + Cristal Alvarez314 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Campos Chacon + Daniela Baylon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Camila Olmos
29W–5L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.17
3
Daniela Baylon
43W–21L career · 30 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.15
3
Ida Santillan
25W–13L career · 19 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Alexa Lopez
17W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
2.91
3
Diana Fonseca
13W–4L career · 12 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.88
3
Cristal Alvarez
22W–10L career · 18 lines in 2026
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Brenda Campos Chacon
25W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Dania Cuellar
24W–15L career · 19 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Dimna Arias
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
CARMEN LEMUS
33W–21L career · 24 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Hilda Gonzales
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Laura Akemi Aizawa
6W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lilian Quinones
12W–7L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mara Culebro
12W–1L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maria De Lourdes Martinez Garcia
20W–13L career · 21 lines in 2026
not enough data
Myrna Dominguez
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sofia de Santiago
16W–3L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
55W–34L career · 40 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.