Teams

Sarasota/Curtin/65&Over7.0W

2024 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Monday

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-03-11vs Payne Park LacroixWon 10
W#3 DoublesDenise Fusselman / Karen Nejdawi vs Jean Lacroix / Kara Ruffner6-0, 6-2
2024-02-26vs LWR Varsity GirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Carole Majewski / Janice Rafalowski4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-01-29vs Payne Park HallWon 10
W#2 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Sigi Moriece / JoMarie Privitera4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Nejdawi / Susan Travers vs Nancy Fehl / Nancy Sneed6-1, 6-3
2024-01-22vs River Strand KendleWon 10
W#2 DoublesDenise Fusselman / Karen Nejdawi vs Christie Stephenson / Colleen Kendle7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Denise Fusselman
published 3.5
3.21
Betsy Winder
published 3.5
3.16
Karen Nejdawi
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Joanne Christie
published
Julie McGue
published
Kimberley Wilson
published
Laura Esposito
published
Louise Harris
published
Mary Stein
published
Nancy Smith
published
PattiAnn Curtin
published
Susan Travers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

PattiAnn Curtin + Louise Harris5152% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Smith + Karen Nejdawi314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Smith + Betsy Winder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Fusselman
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Betsy Winder
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
5%93%1%
3.21
Karen Nejdawi
41W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Joanne Christie
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie McGue
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kimberley Wilson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Esposito
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Louise Harris
11W–14L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Stein
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Smith
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
PattiAnn Curtin
25W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Travers
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.