Teams

Horna/Murfreesboro

2025 Adult 40 & Over - Murfreesboro · 4.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-10vs Green/MurfreesboroWon 31
W#1 DoublesLori Warrick / Jennifer Kelley vs Kari Pendleton / Kathleen Carbonari2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAlana Mccormack vs Loralie Liggett6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Horna / Kelly Mason vs Katherine Goodson / Shannon Smith2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAmy Gilmore / Vickie Freas vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Jenni Orahood6-1, 6-3
2025-05-09vs Green/MurfreesboroWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmy Gilmore / Vickie Freas vs Stephanie Feyes / Palina Beck6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSara Bryson vs Sharling Grummon4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLori Warrick / Alana Mccormack vs Elizabeth Csernovicz / Jenni Orahood6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVenessa Seivers / Leslie Gilliam vs Margie Barr / Sarah Green3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-13vs Green/MurfreesboroSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLori Warrick / Ashley Saliba vs Katie Feyes / Katherine Goodson6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesAlana Mccormack vs Dana Kotarba3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKelly Horna / Kelly Mason vs Margie Barr / Stephanie Feyes6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCollier Andress Smith / Jennifer Kelley vs Carrie Jones / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO3-6, 2-6
2025-04-12vs Green/MurfreesboroWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Gilmore / Alana Mccormack vs Palina Beck / Liza Robinson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKelly Horna / Kelly Mason vs Carrie Jones / PAULA GARCIA de QUEVEDO6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLori Warrick / Janet Adamson vs Sarah Green / Shannon Smith6-1, 6-2
2025-04-06vs Green/MurfreesboroSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLori Warrick / Ashley Saliba vs Stephanie Feyes / Katherine Goodson6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesAlana Mccormack vs Sarah Green6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Horna / Vickie Freas vs Carrie Jones / Katie Feyes6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Gilliam / Collier Andress Smith vs Liza Robinson / Kathleen Carbonari4-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs Green/MurfreesboroLost 13
L#1 DoublesAshley Saliba / Lorraine Thacker vs Palina Beck / Stephanie Feyes2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlana Mccormack vs Dana Kotarba5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Gilmore / Lori Warrick vs Kari Pendleton / Katie Feyes6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Horna / Venessa Seivers vs Sharling Grummon / Sarah Green2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Amy Gilmore
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Lori Warrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.18
Alana Mccormack
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.17
Vickie Freas
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.16
Ashley Saliba
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Lorraine Thacker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Leslie Gilliam
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Collier Andress Smith
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.74
Janet Adamson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Sara Bryson
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Venessa Seivers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Kelly Horna
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Warrick + Alana Mccormack4262% games+12.2% vs expected
Lorraine Thacker + Ashley Saliba5358% games+11.5% vs expected
Leslie Gilliam + Venessa Seivers6552% games−2.6% vs expected
Lori Warrick + Janet Adamson5159% gamesnot enough data
Amy Gilmore + Alana Mccormack4159% gamesnot enough data
Lori Warrick + Ashley Saliba303 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Sara Bryson033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Horna + Janet Adamson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Gilmore
30W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
Lori Warrick
24W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Alana Mccormack
28W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Vickie Freas
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Ashley Saliba
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
4.16
Lorraine Thacker
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
4.04
Leslie Gilliam
8W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.87
4
Collier Andress Smith
31W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
Janet Adamson
28W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Sara Bryson
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.69
Venessa Seivers
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Kelly Horna
19W–21L career · 9 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.