Teams

UPTA70A/Woerz/Keowee Key

2025 UPTA Adult 70 & Over - SC · 70 Adult Men - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-16vs UPTA70A/Dobson/RiversideWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Uhlig / Larry Berridge vs Charles Mullen / Ed Steinbeck7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGerald Hendrick / David Pontell vs Bob Hanis / John Groves5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLarry Wingard / Dean Twedt vs Rayford McNair / Geary Angermeier6-1, 3-3
2025-03-26vs UPTA70A/Dobson/RiversideLost 12
W#1 DoublesGerald Hendrick / David Pontell vs Rayford McNair / John Groves6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobert Daffin / Kenneth Uhlig vs David Dobson / Bob Hanis4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWilson Craft / Larry Wingard vs Charles Mullen / Henere P Valk6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 70 Adult Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Dean Twedt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Gerald Hendrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Kenneth Uhlig
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.27
Robert Daffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Larry Berridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
David Pontell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.15
Wilson Craft
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Larry Wingard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Stephen Woerz
published
Lowell Weaner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Wingard + Dean Twedt5263% games+8.7% vs expected
Kenneth Uhlig + Larry Berridge6548% games+0.7% vs expected
Dean Twedt + David Pontell2345% gamesnot enough data
Gerald Hendrick + David Pontell134 matchesnot enough data
Larry Wingard + David Pontell314 matchesnot enough data
Wilson Craft + Robert Daffin314 matchesnot enough data
Larry Wingard + Stephen Woerz033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dean Twedt
15W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Gerald Hendrick
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Kenneth Uhlig
20W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Robert Daffin
12W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Larry Berridge
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%89%1%
3.18
3
David Pontell
9W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Wilson Craft
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Larry Wingard
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Stephen Woerz
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Lowell Weaner
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.