Teams

OCC Olson Men's

2025 Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over · Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-10vs BCC JesterLost 14
L#1 DoublesRobert Benton / Matt Lusher vs Norman Darden / David Heppner2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBranden Brooks vs Lapsley Denham5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Maddox / Jesse Naples vs Joseph Antonelli / Gary Sibcy1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJonathon Jones vs Chuck McGinnis2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTom Boylan / Neil Moore vs Paul Denham / Royston Jester7-5, 6-4
2025-06-05vs BCC JesterLost 14
L#1 DoublesTodd Olson / Will Rhem vs Joseph Antonelli / Phillip Miller3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSomnath Das vs Scott Rainey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatt Lusher / Neil Moore vs Lapsley Denham / Paul Denham1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJesse Naples vs Chuck McGinnis4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTom Boylan / Jonathon Jones vs Norman Darden / David Heppner1-6, 0-6
2025-06-03vs BCC JesterWon 32
L#1 DoublesBranden Brooks / Matt Lusher vs William Daughtrey / Scott Rainey2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSomnath Das vs Lapsley Denham6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTom Boylan / Will Rhem vs David Heppner / Phillip Miller0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJesse Naples vs Scott Kowalski6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJonathon Jones / Thomas Scott vs Paul Denham / Norman Darden3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-20vs BCC JesterLost 14
L#1 DoublesRobert Benton / Matt Lusher vs Phillip Miller / Scott Rainey1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSomnath Das vs Lapsley Denham6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJonathon Jones / Will Rhem vs William Daughtrey / John Reitelbach1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJesse Naples vs Chuck McGinnis2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Maddox / Neil Moore vs Joseph Antonelli / David Heppner4-6, 4-6
2025-05-10vs BCC JesterLost 23
L#1 DoublesNeil Moore / Daniel Maddox vs David Heppner / Scott Rainey2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesSomnath Das vs Lapsley Denham6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Scott / Jonathon Jones vs Alexis Richards / Scott Kowalski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBranden Brooks vs Chuck McGinnis2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Lusher / Tom Boylan vs Paul Denham / Patrick Ferguson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-05-06vs BCC JesterLost 23
L#1 DoublesTodd Olson / Branden Brooks vs David Heppner / Scott Rainey0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMatt Lusher vs Patrick Ferguson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSomnath Das / Jonathon Jones vs Alexis Richards / Phillip Miller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNeil Moore vs Chuck McGinnis2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWill Rhem / Thomas Scott vs Royston Jester / Lapsley Denham6-2, 6-1
2025-04-29vs BCC JesterLost 13
L#1 DoublesTom Boylan / Thomas Scott vs Phillip Miller / Scott Rainey1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSomnath Das vs Chuck McGinnis6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJonathon Jones / Neil Moore vs Scott Kowalski / Gary Sibcy3-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesWill Rhem vs John Reitelbach3-6, 0-6
2025-04-22vs BCC JesterLost 13
L#1 DoublesNeil Moore / Thomas Scott vs Joseph Antonelli / Phillip Miller6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSomnath Das vs John Reitelbach6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRobert Benton / Jonathon Jones vs Chuck McGinnis / Gary Sibcy3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBranden Brooks vs Norman Darden0-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lynchburg Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Daniel Maddox
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Neil Moore
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.17
Robert Benton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Matt Lusher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.10
Jonathon Jones
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.01
Branden Brooks
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Jesse Naples
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Somnath Das
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Thomas Scott
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Todd Olson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Tom Boylan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Will Rhem
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Maddox
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Neil Moore
10W–17L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.23
Robert Benton
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Matt Lusher
23W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jonathon Jones
9W–24L career · 8 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Branden Brooks
9W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Jesse Naples
12W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Somnath Das
13W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Scott
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Olson
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Boylan
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Will Rhem
2W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.