Teams

X40 8.0 MV1 Chuko

2022 NEOTA Mixed 40 & Over Summer · NEOTA 8.0 40&O Mixed Summer

10 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-24vs X40 8.0 MV2 ColeWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdam Atwell / Lauren Smith vs Brian Filippini / Shelley Li6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJoseph Stimac / Lisa Zeitz vs Wei Liao / Michelle Miluk6-4, 6-4
2022-07-17vs NEO X40 8.0 LoescherWon 21
W#1 DoublesAdam Atwell / Cynthia Rhyner vs Norm Loescher / Angela Lewis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Stimac / Lisa Zeitz vs Scott KITZMILLER / Caterina Petty3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Mock / Caroline Schwartz vs Jeffrey Tong / Beth Schwartz6-0, 6-3
2022-07-10vs X40 8.0 MM MercuriWon 21
L#1 DoublesArmen Panosyan / Cynthia Rhyner vs Natalia Rosca / Christopher Jarox3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Missy Sherwin vs Kathleen Aranavage / Eric Vinborg7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Stimac / Lisa Zeitz vs Susan Vinborg / Daniel Palermo7-5, 6-2
2022-06-26vs X40 8.0 MV2 ColeWon 20
W#1 DoublesArmen Panosyan / Cynthia Rhyner vs Preet Kang / Janeen Miklowski3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEric Mock / Lisa Zeitz vs David Cole / Shelley Li4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-19vs NEO X40 8.0 LoescherLost 12
W#1 DoublesArmen Panosyan / Kristin Chuko vs Norm Loescher / Carole Sanderson7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJoseph Stimac / Lisa Zeitz vs James Yurak / Johanna Yurak2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesEric Mock / Cynthia Rhyner vs Scott KITZMILLER / Courtney Foster4-6, 5-7
2022-06-12vs X40 8.0 MM MercuriWon 21
L#1 DoublesAdam Atwell / Cynthia Rhyner vs Rachel Wright / Frank Mercuri5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesEric Mock / Amy Zucca vs Susan Vinborg / Christopher Jarox6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Stimac / Lisa Zeitz vs Patricia Mercuri / Eric Vinborg4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-05vs X40 8.0 MV2 ColeWon 20
W#1 DoublesArmen Panosyan / Missy Sherwin vs Tom McPhillips / Donna Rondini6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEric Mock / Caroline Schwartz vs Matthew Horwich / Shelley Li6-3, 6-2
2022-05-22vs NEO X40 8.0 LoescherLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Schwartz / Eric Mock vs Angela Lewis / Paul Mitnick6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdam Atwell / Kristin Chuko vs Scott KITZMILLER / Caterina Petty3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-15vs X40 8.0 MM MercuriWon 21
W#1 DoublesMissy Sherwin / Phong Nguyen vs Daniel Palermo / Natalia Rosca6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCynthia Rhyner / Armen Panosyan vs Curtis Ottens / Deanne Gibson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoseph Stimac / Amy Zucca vs Jan Kolesar / David Kolesar6-0, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · NEOTA 8.0 40&O Mixed Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO X40 8.0 Loescher8121618197
2X40 8.0 MV1 Chuko72151230247
3X40 8.0 MM Mercuri2791837256
4X40 8.0 MV2 Cole1891840270

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Armen Panosyan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Adam Atwell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.94
Caroline Schwartz
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Amy Zucca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Eric Mock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Kristin Chuko
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Joseph Stimac
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Cynthia Rhyner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Lisa Zeitz
published
Missy Sherwin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Atwell + Kristin Chuko5354% games−1.1% vs expected
Kristin Chuko + Armen Panosyan7255% gamesnot enough data
Amy Zucca + Joseph Stimac134 matchesnot enough data
Adam Atwell + Caroline Schwartz314 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Schwartz + Eric Mock314 matchesnot enough data
Cynthia Rhyner + Armen Panosyan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Armen Panosyan
29W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Adam Atwell
80W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.08
4
Caroline Schwartz
137W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Amy Zucca
82W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Eric Mock
113W–101L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Kristin Chuko
215W–144L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
Joseph Stimac
51W–109L career · 6 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Cynthia Rhyner
135W–114L career · 6 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
2.92
Lisa Zeitz
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Missy Sherwin
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.