Teams

EOBrien (WSRC)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-20vs MThompson (Windyrush)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Mike Thompson4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Burns McGarry1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAlberto Botero vs Tommy Cary6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-06vs DBarden (Mountainbrook)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBradley Holcman vs Heyward Bouknight6-1, 7-6
L#2 SinglesAlberto Botero vs Robert Barden4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesEric O'Brien vs Bill Helman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-29vs HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)Won 30
W#1 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Raul Zamudio6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlberto Botero vs Tim Rodriguez6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesEric O'Brien vs Philip Heidkamp6-0, 6-1
2026-06-22vs LEvansek (Blakeney)Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Rishi Gogate4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKevin Stein vs Leonard Evansek1-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesEric O'Brien vs Manojkumar Panachikal Madhavan3-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs CRabidou (Carmel)Won 21
W#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs George Sistrunk7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Steven DiVittorio6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesAlberto Botero vs Scott Hansen5-7, 4-6
2026-06-08vs MFiddes (Raintree)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesVladislav Valtsis vs Mark Fiddes0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Brian Austin6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Vikram Datta1-6, 4-6
2026-06-01vs KFranks (PPRSC)Lost 03
L#1 SinglesJaiganesh Rajamanickam vs Alven Weil2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesJoseph Dichak vs Chris McIver3-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesAlberto Botero vs Alan Roll3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KFranks (PPRSC)34101124193
2DBarden (Mountainbrook)3481326197
3EOBrien (WSRC)3491227198
4MFiddes (Raintree)2581328204
5HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)1631837238

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Bradley Holcman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Joseph Dichak
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Eric O'Brien
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Jaiganesh Rajamanickam
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.19
Kevin Stein
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Vladislav Valtsis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.11
Alberto Botero
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bradley Holcman
63W–40L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.41
3.5
Joseph Dichak
138W–146L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
3.37
Eric O'Brien
16W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Jaiganesh Rajamanickam
6W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.20
Kevin Stein
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Vladislav Valtsis
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
3.5
Alberto Botero
8W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.