Teams

LAGUNA CREEK 18MX8.0A

2025 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-20vs ROSEVILLE LIFE TIME 18MX8.0ALost 12
L#1 DoublesGregory Hayes / Jennifer Fong-Jackson vs Danielle Reading / John Reading6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Sloan / Dave Smith vs Sujith Bhoja / Kathy Carter6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Gong / Myrthel Daquis vs David Hall / Laura Sorgea2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Milla Austin
published
4.04
Dinh Tran
published
3.91
Eva Wilson-Lee
published
3.83
Daniel Gong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Cyrus Orandi
published 4
3.75
3.73
Jason Shintaku
published
3.73
Jennifer Fong-Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Marissa Friedman
published
3.68
Mark Montgomery
published
3.66
Myrthel Daquis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Derrick Ross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.62
Melissa Sloan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
Jason Betschart
published
3.43
Dave Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Chinh Tran Vo
published 3.5
3.34
3.21
Jenifer Coston
published
Gregory Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Betschart + Jennifer Fong-Jackson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Milla Austin
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
4.20
Dinh Tran
21W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
4.04
Eva Wilson-Lee
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Daniel Gong
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Cyrus Orandi
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Charmaine Caridad
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Jason Shintaku
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Jennifer Fong-Jackson
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Marissa Friedman
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.71
Mark Montgomery
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Myrthel Daquis
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Derrick Ross
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Melissa Sloan
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
Jason Betschart
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Dave Smith
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Chinh Tran Vo
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Douangchanh Lattasima
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
Jenifer Coston
8W–18L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Gregory Hayes
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.