Teams

Alamo City Tennis Club

2025 18 & OVER Fall Men-NA · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-01vs Sonterra OverservedLost 13
W#1 DoublesRon Land / Richard Toback vs Brian Huchingson / Kent Kirkman7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesErdem Aktas vs Keith Taylor5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarlos Martinez / Travis Headley vs Sergio Z Avila / William Anthony3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesStephen Amberg / John Boyce vs Teal Hausman / Mark Garcia4-6, 1-6
2025-10-25vs Dropping DeucesLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Landry / Richard Toback vs Adam Boriack / Steven Fox4-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesErdem Aktas vs David Worsham3-6, 4-6
2025-10-18vs Full Metal RacketsSplit 22
W#1 SinglesErdem Aktas vs Kevin Stouwie6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTodd Landry / Carlos Martinez vs Clayton Perry / Evin Dugas6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesRon Land vs Matthew Wilson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Boyce / Travis Headley vs David Schleiger / Kenneth Sullivan3-6, 4-6
2025-10-11vs Shavano Double ShotsLost 13
L#1 SinglesRon Land vs Michael Saylor4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTodd Landry / Doug McMurry vs Thad Hogan II / Taylor Clark2-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesErdem Aktas vs DANIEL BARRON7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDavid Fernandez / Jay Lawlor vs Alex Oroszlan / Robert Montgomery4-6, 1-6
2025-10-04vs TCSA Serve-AzesLost 05
L#1 DoublesCarlos Martinez / Jay Lawlor vs Jesus Melendrez / Jorge Munoz5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJonathan Trejo vs Henry Sanchez Jr0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTravis Headley / Doug McMurry vs John Moore / Richard Ramos2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesErdem Aktas vs Joshua Huerta6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTodd Landry / Michael Urbis vs Ariel Canonizado / Javi Fuentes0-6, 3-6
2025-09-27vs Dominion SpartansLost 03
L#1 SinglesDavid Fernandez vs Eduardo Cadena2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Boyce / Travis Headley vs Raul Guerra / TONY CASTRO0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJay Lawlor vs Cameron Weldon4-6, 0-6
2025-09-20vs Green Tree TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesErdem Aktas / John Gordon vs Daniel Zimmerman / Matt Arnett0-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRon Land vs Jeffrey Hale3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJonathan Trejo vs Hector Vessi7-6, 6-4
2025-09-13vs Sonterra SlammersWon 31
L#1 SinglesRon Land vs Shiva Sandrana3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDoug McMurry / David Fernandez vs Scott McClure / Hector Diaz-Escobar6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesErdem Aktas vs Mohammed Lilo6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJay Lawlor / Travis Headley vs James SENARY / Joseph Lawrence1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-09-06vs Tennis ParkLost 12
L#1 SinglesErdem Aktas vs Brent Smith6-7, 6-7
W#2 SinglesRon Land vs Sean Curtis7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJay Lawlor / Coby Huerta vs Ari Friedman / Jose Ortiz1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Ron Land
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Erdem Aktas
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.73
Doug McMurry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Michael Urbis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
David Fernandez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.61
John Boyce
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Jay Lawlor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Todd Landry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Travis Headley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
John Gordon
published
Jonathan Trejo
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Stephen Amberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Lawlor + Travis Headley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ron Land
3W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Erdem Aktas
3W–7L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Doug McMurry
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
Michael Urbis
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
David Fernandez
2W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
2.64
John Boyce
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jay Lawlor
3W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.50
Todd Landry
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
Travis Headley
1W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
2.48
John Gordon
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jonathan Trejo
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Amberg
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.