Teams

KBlandford/SPurdy (Park Road)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-05-03vs KVaughan (Weddington)Won 10
W#3 DoublesCarole Ann Araiza / Nicole Umpleby vs Kym Armbruster / Stacey Miller6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2024-04-26vs KMonson (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDiane Smith / Kelly Blandford vs Katie Monson / Anita Matai4-6, 2-6
2024-04-19vs KWebster (BCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesKelly Blandford / Mary Zito vs Kathleen McAllister / Kristin Webster3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-22vs AReynolds (CSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMary Zito / Carole Ann Araiza vs Allison Dawson / Christine Strife4-6, 3-6
2024-03-15vs MCollins/Ahn (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKelly Blandford vs Cameron Logar4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Purdy / Carole Ann Araiza vs Mary Collins / Angie Wagner6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-08vs SAbbott (Queens)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Blandford / Suzanne Purdy vs Dayna Sheehan / Katie Shute6-1, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Carole Ann Araiza
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Nicole Umpleby
published
2.96
Sarah Cooper
published
2.89
Suzanne Purdy
published
2.85
Kelly Blandford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Joanne Lindley
published 3
2.71
2.62
Meredith Anglin
published
2.50
Ellen Gibel
published
2.48
Cody Chase
published 3
2.28
Amy Millikan
published 2.5
Marilyn Spencer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Blandford + Joanne Lindley1443% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Cooper + Nicole Umpleby224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carole Ann Araiza
21W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
3.07
Nicole Umpleby
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Sarah Cooper
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
2.96
Suzanne Purdy
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Kelly Blandford
21W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Joanne Lindley
17W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Serena Kossisyan-Perlman
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Meredith Anglin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.62
Ellen Gibel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Cody Chase
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Amy Millikan
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.28
Marilyn Spencer
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.