Teams

Su.Braga18M

2023 Cap 18 & Over Mixed · 6.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-07-23vs Ja.Dix18MWon 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Alford / Paige Alford vs Molly Lewis / Jared Dix6-0, 6-4
2023-07-21vs Ma.Gonella18MWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas Albertson / Suzanne Braga vs Meagan Moore / John Moore6-1, 6-2
2023-07-16vs Br.Shait18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Albertson / Suzanne Braga vs Yee Nguyen / Maggie Patterson2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-25vs Er.Hemminger18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesTravis Salts / Suzanne Braga vs Ben Rost / Sheila Breckenridge2-6, 1-6
2023-06-18vs Lo.Elliott18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaige Alford / Travis Salts vs Howard Critcher / Laura Edgerton4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Copley / Thomas Albertson vs John Talton / Kathy Bostrom6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-11vs El.Hsiung18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Josh Hastings vs Teresa Ling / Rajiv Raj4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Brad McGinity vs Kyleigh Dunn / Colin Savage2-6, 4-6
2023-06-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesThomas Albertson / Cassy Albertson vs Ashleigh Hayward / David Flowers6-3, 6-3
2023-05-31vs Sh.Littleton18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Travis Salts vs BILLY WILLIAMS / Cathy Williams6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJosh Hastings / Cassy Albertson vs Patty Parrnelli / Lenny Parrnelli6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Josh Hastings
published
3.11
Jaime Clark
published
3.10
Paige Alford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.04
Thomas Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Suzanne Braga
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.71
Kathryn White
published
2.70
Sarah Copley
published
2.67
Cassy Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Travis Salts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassy Albertson + Thomas Albertson10854% games+8.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Hastings
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jaime Clark
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–136L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Thomas Albertson
49W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–54L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
Kathryn White
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.71
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Cassy Albertson
39W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Travis Salts
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.