Teams

DMS FIELDING

2025 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Saturday Ladies 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-26vs TCU HAMPTON/SUDDERTHWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Collier / Sharilynn Gates vs Hella Schafner / Darci Miklos6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohnna Jones / Twana Holmes vs Marcel Kerr / Tricia Spann2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Stumpff / Javonna Fielding vs Maureen Doss / Caroline Archuleta6-3, 6-3
2025-04-09vs MV CHU/TOUPSLost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Knapp vs Tandra Langford1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday Ladies 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Sharilynn Gates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kathy Lowery
published
3.14
Johnna Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Lori Ruehle
published
3.03
Amy Burson
published 3.5
2.98
Twana Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lesia Allen
published
2.90
Linda Stumpff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Javonna Fielding
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Knapp
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Javonna Fielding + Linda Stumpff1638% games+3.2% vs expected
Sharilynn Gates + Johnna Jones3249% games+3.1% vs expected
Lori Ruehle + Lesia Allen41339% games−2.4% vs expected
Lori Ruehle + Amy Burson224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Stumpff + Johnna Jones134 matchesnot enough data
Twana Holmes + Johnna Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Lori Ruehle + Linda Stumpff033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharilynn Gates
18W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Kathy Lowery
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Johnna Jones
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.14
Lori Ruehle
9W–25L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Amy Burson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Twana Holmes
6W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Lesia Allen
5W–17L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Linda Stumpff
8W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Javonna Fielding
5W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Rachel Knapp
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.