Teams

Roberts, Tiffany

2023 Adult 18 & Over Daytime League 2.5W - 5.0 · 4.0 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.67 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-11-11vs Bruner, KatherineWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbi Richards / Katherine Markes vs Kris Townsend / Kayce Cloud5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesPam Thompson / Karen Kopulos vs Shanna Loyd / Janice Redlingshafer6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTiffany Roberts / Monica Fairman vs Kami Myrick / Christine Schwermann6-1, 6-3
2022-11-04vs Menghini, JessicaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKim O'Brien / Pam Thompson vs Karina Hoffmann / Susan Hoffman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Roberts / Kim Kosic vs Lori Ambroske / Linda Shinn5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristy Gudenkauf / Kim Dunmire vs Lori Blinn / Katie Trenkle6-3, 6-3
2022-09-23vs Jody HolsingerLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Bernstein / Amy Stenslie vs Renee Steffes / Sara Armer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim O'Brien / Pamela Protzman vs Elizabeth Roberts / Stacey Moore6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristy Gudenkauf / Katherine Markes vs Jody Holsinger / Julie Kehrwald4-6, 1-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1French, Melinda9124616201
2Jody Holsinger7322821215
3Thompson, Lisa7321926258
4Wedel, Nancy73161433254
5Roberts, Tiffany46121840284
6Beckley, Robyn46111941308
7Lovinggood, Marla4692148329
8Bruner, Katherine37131738282
9Heurtin, Kristin2892144309
10Menghini, Jessica01052552335

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Kim O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Katherine Markes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Amy Stenslie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Kim Kosic
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Lynette Hogan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Pam Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Sherrie Propeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Pamela Protzman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Barbi Richards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Monica Fairman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Karen Kopulos
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.14
Kim Dunmire
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.09
Christy Gudenkauf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Hare
published
Pam Cowan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Pamela Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Bernstein
published
Tiffany Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherrie Propeck + Katherine Markes6558% games+12.8% vs expected
Tiffany Roberts + Karen Kopulos6553% games+11.1% vs expected
Kim Kosic + Pamela Protzman6170% games+10.1% vs expected
Kim O'Brien + Katherine Markes2550% games+10.0% vs expected
Sherrie Propeck + Lynette Hogan4262% games+9.3% vs expected
Tiffany Roberts + Sherrie Propeck4251% games+8.5% vs expected
Lynette Hogan + Christy Gudenkauf5451% games+6.2% vs expected
Katherine Markes + Kim Kosic9355% games+6.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim O'Brien
64W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Katherine Markes
74W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Amy Stenslie
56W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
9%89%1%
3.68
Kim Kosic
68W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
Lynette Hogan
39W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Pam Thompson
40W–36L career · 2 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
Sherrie Propeck
39W–49L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.37
Pamela Protzman
67W–68L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Barbi Richards
56W–72L career · 1 line in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Monica Fairman
79W–85L career · 1 line in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Karen Kopulos
62W–70L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Kim Dunmire
25W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Christy Gudenkauf
62W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Hare
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Cowan
19W–43L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pamela Baker
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Bernstein
16W–14L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Roberts
27W–33L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.