Teams

Carefree, Schnabel/Marks

2021 18&Over Mixed · 9.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.21 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-01-31vs Carefree, ChafferLost 12
W#1 DoublesTerry Kossegi / Jennifer Einhorn vs Eric Chaffer / Renee Lemmerman6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesIan Zaslansky / Nancy Turnblacer vs Jake Kolenberg / Cristina Leek7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaul Schnabel / Beth Mercante vs Samantha Perri / Sean Umhafer3-6, 5-7
2020-12-12vs LI: Lynbrook, BlueLost 03
L#1 DoublesJonathan Bonnet / Cristina Bryan vs Tatiana Dualiby / Thiago Natale Dualiby1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Einhorn / Terry Kossegi vs Csaba Laszlo / Karyn Sackstein4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMitchell Low / Beth Mercante vs Danny Casesa / Sondra Glueck5-7, 3-6
2020-11-22vs Carefree, ChafferWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerry Kossegi / Jennifer Einhorn vs Adam Kolenberg / Elizabeth Ingrassia5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Bonnet / Cristina Bryan vs Joseph Perri / Mary Venier-Zwirn6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMitchell Low / Beth Mercante vs Jake Kolenberg / Sandy Keenan6-2, 7-5
2020-10-25vs LI: Lynbrook, BlueWon 21
L#1 DoublesTerry Kossegi / Katie Figgie vs Danny Casesa / Sondra Glueck1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Schnabel / Antonella Karlin vs RJ Narciso / Jacqueline Clark6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesIan Zaslansky / Nancy Turnblacer vs Christopher Wolfe / Susan Bacey6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Deer Park, Chua-McAloine031816101
2Carefree, Schnabel/Marks046615121
3LI: Lynbrook, Blue06153793

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Antonella Karlin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Jonathan Bonnet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.27
Terry Kossegi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Mitchell Low
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Katie Figgie
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Ian Zaslansky
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Beth Mercante
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Brian Connor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.55
Cristina Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jennifer Einhorn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Turnblacer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Schnabel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antonella Karlin + Terry Kossegi6259% games+11.2% vs expected
Katie Figgie + Mitchell Low6650% games−5.7% vs expected
Mitchell Low + Antonella Karlin5153% games−8.9% vs expected
Cristina Bryan + Paul Schnabel5352% gamesnot enough data
Katie Figgie + Brian Connor4153% gamesnot enough data
Katie Figgie + Terry Kossegi2341% gamesnot enough data
Mitchell Low + Beth Mercante2343% gamesnot enough data
Paul Schnabel + Beth Mercante3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Antonella Karlin
153W–46L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%68%32%
4.44
Jonathan Bonnet
15W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
4.39
4.5
Terry Kossegi
103W–77L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Mitchell Low
276W–157L career · 4 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
4.25
Katie Figgie
100W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Ian Zaslansky
212W–100L career · 9 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Beth Mercante
32W–44L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Brian Connor
86W–71L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Cristina Bryan
70W–75L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Einhorn
51W–37L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Turnblacer
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul Schnabel
52W–28L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.