Teams

HMTC RED

2024 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - NOCO · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-07vs FCCC BLACKLost 02
L#2 DoublesJudy Stout / Jim Draper vs Tara Delaney / Brett Kemp5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGene Stout / Mandy Staehler vs Austin Kelly / Victoria Archer3-6, 2-6
2024-06-30vs MLF BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesGene Stout / Mandy Staehler vs Jeffrey Ehrlich / Bettina Cosima Larrarte0-6, 1-6
2024-06-23vs CSU GREENLost 01
L#3 DoublesGene Stout / Mandy Staehler vs Stacey Hogan / Ryan Rutherford2-6, 3-6
2024-06-09vs FCCC BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesCrystal Stowe / Ryan Stowe vs Tara Delaney / Stephen Roberti5-7, 4-6
2024-06-02vs MLF BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Stowe / Crystal Stowe vs Curtis Tesdahl / Sage Snowdon6-3, 7-6
2024-05-26vs CSU GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesCrystal Stowe / Ryan Stowe vs Cindy Eisenberg / Michael Trotter5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGene Stout / Judy Stout vs Wendy Sprague / Rick Merlino5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Crystal Stowe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.82
Bob Griffith
published 3
2.82
Shirley Moore
published
2.81
Mandy Staehler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Ryan Stowe
published
2.72
Tracy Sanders
published
2.71
Lora Griffith
published
2.68
Chris Hoch
published 3
2.40
Judy Stout
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jim Draper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Sanders + Chris Hoch0530% gamesnot enough data
Lora Griffith + Bob Griffith3255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Crystal Stowe
35W–40L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Bob Griffith
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Shirley Moore
34W–27L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Mandy Staehler
30W–43L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
Ryan Stowe
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
Tracy Sanders
10W–25L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Lora Griffith
38W–22L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Chris Hoch
2W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Judy Stout
35W–126L career · 2 lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
2.40
Jim Draper
1W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.