Teams

UPTA55C/McCarthy/Reserve

2023 UPTA Combo 55 & Over - SC · 55+ Combo Women - 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-09-13vs UPTA55C/Wynne/Spindle TreeWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Lisa Maly vs Lisa Cain / Laura Karns6-2, 6-1
2023-09-06vs UPTA55C/Loyd/BrookstoneLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Davis / Beverly Gibbs vs Sharon Colker / Doni Willmering1-6, 3-6
2023-07-26vs UPTA55C/Lawson/Holly TreeWon 10
W#3 DoublesBeverly Gibbs / Nancy Schlegel vs Sandra Wright / Diane Zeager6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Lisa Maly
published
Colette Schwartz
published 3.5
3.19
Gayle Burrer
published 3.5
3.18
Bobbi Nailor
published 3
3.03
Beverly Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Kim Smentek
published
2.86
Michele Evanski
published
2.82
Kay King
published
Alleta McKeon
published 3
Diane Dix
published 3
2.52
Kathy Mendel
published
Linda Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kim Smentek + Bobbi Nailor6260% games+7.3% vs expected
Kim Smentek + Michele Evanski123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Mendel + Michele Evanski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Maly
43W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
3.5
Colette Schwartz
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Gayle Burrer
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Bobbi Nailor
18W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.18
3
Beverly Gibbs
74W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
Kim Smentek
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
2.96
Michele Evanski
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
Kay King
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Alleta McKeon
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Diane Dix
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Mendel
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
44%55%<1%
2.52
Linda Davis
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.