Teams

VTC-Savage

2020 Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

4 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Brad Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Jack Crossen
published 3
Hoyun Barr
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 0
Results5 ties
2020-03-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Johnson / Hoyun Barr vs Yanchen Qi / Ashok Nedungadi6-4, 6-2
2020-02-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesHoyun Barr / Brad Johnson vs Vasilios Garyfallou / Heidi Nevin6-4, 7-5
2020-02-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Diane Nelson vs Nick Hooker / Nicola Ash6-4, 6-2
2020-01-19Won 20
W#1 DoublesBrad Johnson / Hoyun Barr vs Manoj Pandya / Paula Stiefel6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMatt Savage / Alana Rhea vs Catherine Huang / Zhong Lei6-3, 6-3
2020-01-12Won 10
W#1 DoublesHoyun Barr / Brad Johnson vs Stan Earnshaw / Jennifer Trank5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Brad Johnson
196W–102L career
0%87%13%
3.48
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77
3
Jack Crossen
33W–50L career
22%76%1%
2.61
0
Hoyun Barr
29W–20L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.