← Teams

PTC-Johnson/Fruits

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Nina Hanson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Michelle Zawadzki
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.31
Julie LaMontagne
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
—
Christie Herkert
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jean Zuber Marshburn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Colleen Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Maya Mori
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.95
Catherine Greenblatt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Hilary Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.76
Christine Egan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-07-18Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesColleen Walker / Catherine Greenblatt vs Melissa Jacobs / Desiree Bliss5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Sara Vanderhoff4-2
W#2 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Molly Albright vs Holly Lekas / Debbie Ackroyd6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Christine Egan vs Milenka Coltman / Janene Larson6-0, 6-1
2021-07-17Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesCatherine Greenblatt / Colleen Walker vs Jing Feng / Wanda Ng6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Betty Roux6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMeegan Fruits / Nina Hanson vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Mihee Park7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Julie LaMontagne vs Rosalie Trevejo / Manisha Thakkar6-3, 6-0
2021-07-10Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesNina Hanson / Maya Mori vs Erin Ince / Heidi Palena6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Alisa Rakoz6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Meegan Fruits vs Delena Palena / Jill Watson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Egan / Julie LaMontagne vs Christina Parks / Tamara Phillips6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2021-06-13Split 2–2
L#1 DoublesNina Hanson / Hilary Johnson vs Melissa Gibson / Brooke Daniel6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Kristen LaBarca7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristie Herkert / Maya Mori vs Emily Shields / Courtney Laing6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMolly Albright / Jean Zuber Marshburn vs Emily Becker / Sara Crate6-4, 6-1
2021-06-06Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesHilary Johnson / Nina Hanson vs Virginia Martinez / Maryann Velez6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJulie LaMontagne vs Robin Burak6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Christie Herkert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Egan / Michelle Zawadzki vs Teresa Darling / Patricia Nierenberg0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-04Won 3–1
W#1 DoublesJean Zuber Marshburn / Nina Hanson vs Hildie Oliver / Simone Frank6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesMichelle Zawadzki vs Yanchen Qi6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMolly Albright / Christine Egan vs Karen Harlow / Heather MacPherson6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHilary Johnson / Julie LaMontagne vs Xia Yuan / Jennifer Thompson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Nina Hanson
110W–57L career
4%96%0%
3.69
3.5
Michelle Zawadzki
74W–33L career
0%81%19%
3.48
3.5
Julie LaMontagne
85W–69L career
0%99%1%
3.31
3.5
Christie Herkert
30W–31L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jean Zuber Marshburn
83W–65L career
6%94%0%
3.16
3.5
Colleen Walker
58W–78L career
9%91%0%
3.14
3.5
Maya Mori
86W–77L career
10%90%0%
3.13
3
Catherine Greenblatt
52W–81L career
0%88%12%
2.95
3
Hilary Johnson
68W–64L career
0%95%5%
2.90
3
Christine Egan
52W–39L career
3%95%2%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.