Teams

Borsh

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-25vs Manor WhiteWon 20
W#2 DoublesAlison Ewing / Meaghan Curry vs Christine Kluh / KAREN WALKER6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Ballman / Lisa Yazdani vs Roxanne Blackwell / Sharon Wiegmann6-0, 6-0
2022-03-21vs HallWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlison Ewing / Meaghan Curry vs Nancy Davis / Kathryn Sampson6-2, 6-1
2022-03-16vs Wild Cards 2.0Split 11
L#1 DoublesMeaghan Curry / Draga Dubick vs Anto Faini / Gay Trinkner2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJo Borsh / Lisa Yazdani vs Sandy Thongphok / Li Ives6-3, 6-4
2022-03-09vs HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesMeaghan Curry / Katherine Dodson vs Karen Rabin / Kathryn Sampson6-1, 6-2
2022-03-04vs Manor BlueWon 10
W#3 DoublesMonica Brenneman / Michelle Ballman vs Sara Foulkes / Dorea McMahon1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-24vs Manor WhiteWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Yazdani / Debbie Glynn vs Sarah Thoms / Alysa Saltman6-2, 6-2
2022-02-14vs Manor BlueLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Ballman / Meaghan Curry vs Julie Gutierrez / Katie Poulos2-6, 5-7
2022-02-03vs Manor WhiteWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Ewing / Meaghan Curry vs Pamela Kleindienst / Debi Palmer6-1, 6-1
2022-01-26vs HallWon 10
W#1 DoublesDraga Dubick / Lisa Yazdani vs Pat Clarke / Jackie Solomon6-0, 6-3
2022-01-10vs Wild Cards 2.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Hickey / Lisa Yazdani vs Gay Trinkner / Anto Faini3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Meaghan Curry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Arienne Mahieu
published 3.5
3.29
Monica Brenneman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Debbie Glynn
published 3.5
3.21
Alison Ewing
published
3.15
Katherine Dodson
published
3.07
Michelle Ballman
published
3.02
Draga Dubick
published 3.5
2.95
Lisa Yazdani
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.89
Judie Fien-Helfman
published
Jo Borsh
published
Laura Narvaiz
published
Rosemary Oshinsky
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Meaghan Curry
84W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
3.5
Arienne Mahieu
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Monica Brenneman
46W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Debbie Glynn
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Alison Ewing
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Katherine Dodson
44W–68L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Michelle Ballman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Draga Dubick
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Lisa Yazdani
67W–54L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
Judie Fien-Helfman
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
2.89
Jo Borsh
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Narvaiz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rosemary Oshinsky
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.