← Teams

MV-Burns

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 4.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Bruce Sylva
published 4.5
4.08
John Bard
published 4.5
—
Darrell Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
Results6 ties
2023-03-26Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesDarrell Hawkins / John Bard vs Mark Simpson / David Wiley6-2, 7-6
2023-03-11Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJordan Burns / Darrell Hawkins vs Augusto Carneiro / Jacques Uber6-4, 6-1
2023-03-03Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesMike Stecker / Darrell Hawkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-02-26Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJohn Bard / Darrell Hawkins vs David Boyer / Justin Ford6-4, 7-5
2023-02-19Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesJohn Bard / Darrell Hawkins vs Preston Davis / David Mittelstadt6-2, 7-5
2023-02-11Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesToby Krauel / Darrell Hawkins vs Matt Simmering / Eric Lee6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Bruce Sylva
16W–15L career
not enough data
—
4.5
John Bard
24W–24L career
11%89%0%
4.08
4
Darrell Hawkins
26W–34L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.