Teams

SunPro-Burdge/Hall

2026 Winter League-Weekday · 4.0W AM

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-12vs SunPro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnna Cronquist / DeeAnn Edwards vs SalleeAnn Miller / Sherilyn Rawlings3-6, 0-6
2026-03-05vs Wasatch Rec-Peterson/KingLost 01
L#1 DoublesNan Black / Anna Cronquist vs Nicole Mills / Angie Neuberger4-6, 2-4
2026-02-26vs Ivory Ridge-Fairbanks/BullingtonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Hall / Suzanne Burdge vs Nicole Holland / Emily Jarvie5-7, 1-3
L#2 DoublesDeeAnn Edwards / Nan Black vs Angie Haskins / Nicole Miller2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Cronquist / Carolyn Barber vs Nanette Brockbank / Jana Fairbanks2-6, 2-6
2026-02-19vs Wasatch Rec-Peterson/KingLost 02
L#2 DoublesMelanie Hall / Suzanne Burdge vs Anna Ziebarth / Kalee King2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNan Black / DeeAnn Edwards vs Heather Probst / Rachel Ray4-6, 3-6
2026-02-12vs SunPro-Warren/CarterLost 12
L#1 DoublesNan Black / DeeAnn Edwards vs Megan Warren / Kortney Osborne2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Hall / Suzanne Burdge vs Kim Halladay / Courtnee Poelman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAnnMarie Chadwick / Anna Cronquist vs Jill Marsh / Melissa Pickard2-6, 1-6
2026-02-05vs Ivory Ridge-Fairbanks/BullingtonLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Burdge / AnnMarie Chadwick vs Lisa Bullington / Lori Murdock4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNan Black / Carolyn Barber vs Heather Allen / Trista Willardson6-7, 3-4
2026-01-29vs Park City MARC-Greenhalgh/BrooksLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeeAnn Edwards / Nan Black vs Carolyn Murnane / Sandee Kozel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Burdge / Anna Cronquist vs Carol Molesky / AMy Huish6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-01-22vs SunPro-Blackhurst/MayberryLost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Burdge / Melanie Hall vs Shelli Johnston / Taylor Kirk6-7, 4-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNan Black / DeeAnn Edwards vs Jill Ford / Tiffany Olson3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Handley
published 4
Amy Rees
published 4
3.62
Melanie Hall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.57
Suzanne Burdge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
DeeAnn Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.43
Anna Cronquist
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.43
AnnMarie Chadwick
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.41
Nan Black
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.36
Carolyn Barber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Jennifer Stringham
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
Carolyn Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Ashley Bailey
published 3.5
3.23
Kristi Parker
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Raquel Westover
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Lori Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Julia Black
published
Susan Christensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Hall + Carolyn Barber8360% games+7.4% vs expected
AnnMarie Chadwick + Suzanne Burdge2445% games+5.2% vs expected
AnnMarie Chadwick + DeeAnn Edwards2645% games+3.1% vs expected
Suzanne Burdge + Melanie Hall151055% games+3.0% vs expected
AnnMarie Chadwick + Lori Curtis1436% games+2.6% vs expected
Suzanne Burdge + Lori Curtis251554% games+1.9% vs expected
Jennifer Stringham + Kristi Parker523453% games+1.1% vs expected
Lori Curtis + Carolyn Barber2948% games+0.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Handley
22W–53L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Amy Rees
26W–46L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Melanie Hall
59W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
Suzanne Burdge
89W–81L career · 6 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
DeeAnn Edwards
117W–144L career · 6 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
4
Anna Cronquist
7W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
AnnMarie Chadwick
88W–74L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Nan Black
48W–77L career · 7 lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Carolyn Barber
88W–75L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Jennifer Stringham
124W–120L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Carolyn Andrus
61W–66L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Ashley Bailey
58W–48L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Kristi Parker
97W–110L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Raquel Westover
113W–129L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Lori Curtis
85W–110L career · 11 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Julia Black
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Christensen
31W–57L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.