Teams

LATA55/Anderson/MW

2025 Adult 55 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-05vs LATA55/Sojourner/LCTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRita Anderson / Kay Chrysostom vs Rita Squires / Lorri Cold4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDiane Hunt / Kathi Sill vs Pamela Skiles / Arlene Wilkes6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJeanne Stone / M Brinkley vs Micki Barber / Deborah Poston7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs LATA55/KNUTSON/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Cross / Peggy Rast vs Traci Gilden / Chris Lefebvre4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Hunt / Betty Ragan vs Casie Henderson / Mary Anne Berry1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRita Anderson / Barbara Sellers vs Lilian Joye / Janet Buhrow1-6, 4-6
2025-03-22vs LATA55/Jones/SSPLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Schmoyer / Cheryl Cooper vs Susan Taylor / Tami Green4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSandra Tankersley / Betty Webb vs Teresa Tracy / Beverly Hill0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDoni Jordan / Jeanne Stone vs Sally Fox / Patty Shoultz0-6, 1-6
2025-03-01vs LATA55/Sojourner/LCTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKay Chrysostom / Rita Anderson vs Rita Squires / Maria Tubolino2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Cross / Katherine Keckeisen vs Denise Holmes / Hanna Gregorio7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Tankersley / Kathi Sill vs Pamela Skiles / Vandrea Lang6-1, 6-2
2025-02-22vs LATA55/KNUTSON/BPLost 12
L#1 DoublesBetty Webb / Peggy Rast vs Traci Gilden / Chris Lefebvre4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Cooper / Betty Ragan vs Mary Anne Berry / Casie Henderson7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRita Anderson / Barbara Sellers vs Janet Buhrow / Sandra Gilfillan5-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-02-15vs LATA55/Jones/SSPLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathi Sill / Kay Chrysostom vs Robbin Cooper / Sally Donaldson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Stephens / Diane Hunt vs Patty Shoultz / Carmen Goulet1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatherine Keckeisen / M Brinkley vs Shelley Lindler / Lisa Senn6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Wendy Schmoyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Betty Webb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Betty Ragan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Diane Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Joanie Drozd
published
3.10
Barbara Cross
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Katherine Stephens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Peggy Rast
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Kathi Sill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Jeanne Stone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Rita Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Kay Chrysostom
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Doni Jordan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Barbara Sellers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
M Brinkley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Keckeisen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandra Tankersley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Hunt + Joanie Drozd4454% games+0.8% vs expected
Barbara Sellers + Jeanne Stone9852% games−1.7% vs expected
Diane Hunt + Kathi Sill224 matchesnot enough data
Diane Hunt + Betty Ragan224 matchesnot enough data
Rita Anderson + Kay Chrysostom044 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Tankersley + Betty Webb213 matchesnot enough data
Kathi Sill + Peggy Rast123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Schmoyer
14W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Betty Webb
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Betty Ragan
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Diane Hunt
11W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Joanie Drozd
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Barbara Cross
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Katherine Stephens
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Peggy Rast
3W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Kathi Sill
42W–88L career · 3 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jeanne Stone
25W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Rita Anderson
2W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kay Chrysostom
14W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Doni Jordan
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Barbara Sellers
16W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
M Brinkley
43W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Katherine Keckeisen
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Tankersley
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.