Teams

Whittenberger - RS Clay

2022 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-31vs Anderson - RS ClayWon 20
W#2 DoublesRyan Elliott / Dodi Stringfellow vs Arturo Ojeda Peraza / Denise Wilson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKristyn Miller / Christopher Zuber vs Emily Ioakim / Tracy Schmidt6-1, 6-3
2022-08-30vs Wallace - RS ClayWon 10
W#2 DoublesAli Kizilbash / Dodi Stringfellow vs Jennifer Passeretti / Ed Souza7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-10vs Hillman - RS ClayWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarl Miller / Dodi Stringfellow vs Andrew Hillman / Celine Hansford6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKristyn Miller / Christopher Zuber vs Russell Ball / Susan Bonsignore7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMax Mustaki / Ingrid Corbett vs Craig Abel / Emily Hillman5-7, 2-6
2022-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesRyan Elliott / Dodi Stringfellow vs Sandra Wilson / Harold Major6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2022-07-27vs Wallace - RS ClaySplit 11
W#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Carl Miller vs Jerry Clark / Erin Rhone2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristopher Zuber / Kristyn Miller vs Bonita Witkin / Kenneth Wallace1-6, 4-6
2022-07-20vs Sumrall - HBTSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRyan Elliott / Dodi Stringfellow vs Whitney Sumrall / Michael Haack6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKristyn Miller / Bobby Corbett vs Amber Fletcher / Hunter Stark1-6, 0-6
2022-07-13vs Anderson - RS ClayLost 01
L#1 DoublesColton Wilson / Ingrid Corbett vs Cherie Tan / Kyle Wilson1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Colton Wilson
published 4
3.75
Ali Kizilbash
published 4
3.66
3.59
Ryan Elliott
published
3.52
Kristyn Miller
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
John Whittenberger
published
3.29
Ingrid Corbett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Christopher Zuber
published 3.5
3.23
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Kaye Whittenberger
published
Max Mustaki
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colton Wilson
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Ali Kizilbash
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Kristyn Miller
134W–112L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
John Whittenberger
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.34
3.5
Ingrid Corbett
67W–38L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christopher Zuber
6W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Kaye Whittenberger
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%39%61%
3.04
Max Mustaki
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.