Teams

Forehand Clan 3.0

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 18 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-08vs FrancoLost 23
L#1 DoublesNate Williams / Hayden Hayag vs Edwin McNicholas / Conner Scott4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Sanchez vs John Hoye1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAllen Acompanado / Aaron Bumanglag vs Rick Goodman / Jason Walters6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRiggs Deleon vs Bobby Abuel7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAdelmar Esplana / Jake Sekerak vs Joseph Cicero / Amit Gupta2-6, 3-6
2025-05-01vs FrancoLost 23
L#1 DoublesHayden Hayag / Allen Acompanado vs Joseph Cicero / Austin Franco7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAaron Bumanglag vs Rick Goodman7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJake Sekerak / Adam Sanchez vs Edwin McNicholas / Jason Walters6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRobert Ngo vs Isaiah Harper6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAdelmar Esplana / Dalton Wiles vs Bobby Abuel / Amit Gupta6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-04-24vs FrancoWon 32
W#1 DoublesRiggs Deleon / Adam Sanchez vs Jason Walters / Bobby Abuel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJake Sekerak vs Joseph Cicero2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesDalton Wiles / Robert Ngo vs Rick Goodman / John Hoye3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAaron Bumanglag vs Conner Scott6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAllen Acompanado / Hayden Hayag vs Austin Franco / Edwin McNicholas2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-10vs FrancoWon 40
W#1 DoublesHayden Hayag / Allen Acompanado vs Austin Franco / Edwin McNicholas6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAaron Bumanglag vs Rick Goodman7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRiggs Deleon / Adam Sanchez vs Jason Walters / Amit Gupta6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Ngo / Nate Williams vs Conner Scott / Joseph Cicero7-5, 6-1
2025-04-03vs FrancoLost 14
W#1 DoublesRiggs Deleon / Adelmar Esplana vs Edwin McNicholas / Amit Gupta1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJake Sekerak vs Joseph Cicero6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAdam Sanchez / Nate Williams vs Bobby Abuel / Jason Walters6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAaron Bumanglag vs John Hoye2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Balino / Allen Acompanado vs Rick Goodman / Conner Scott1-6, 1-6
2025-03-27vs FrancoLost 13
L#1 DoublesAdam Sanchez / Hayden Hayag vs Joseph Cicero / Bobby Abuel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNate Williams vs John Hoye3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRobert Ngo / Adelmar Esplana vs Conner Scott / Isaiah Harper3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAllen Acompanado vs Austin Franco5-7, 4-6
2025-03-20vs FrancoSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHayden Hayag / Allen Acompanado vs Conner Scott / Isaiah Harper6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAaron Bumanglag vs Joseph Cicero0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRiggs Deleon / Adam Sanchez vs Rick Goodman / Jason Walters5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNate Williams vs Bobby Abuel1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 18 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Shaun Sabio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.09
Riggs Deleon
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
Robert Ngo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.89
Allen Acompanado
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Aaron Bumanglag
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Adam Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Adelmar Esplana
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dalton Wiles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Hayden Hayag
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Jake Sekerak
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jeffrey Balino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nate Williams
usually #2 Doubles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayden Hayag + Allen Acompanado314 matchesnot enough data
Robert Ngo + Allen Acompanado224 matchesnot enough data
Riggs Deleon + Adam Sanchez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shaun Sabio
52W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Riggs Deleon
11W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Robert Ngo
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
3
Allen Acompanado
11W–7L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Aaron Bumanglag
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Adam Sanchez
4W–3L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Adelmar Esplana
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dalton Wiles
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hayden Hayag
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jake Sekerak
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Balino
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nate Williams
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.