Teams

Martin/Knoxville

2026 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-17vs Maccagli/KnoxvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesCynthia Reed / Susan Lahrs vs Patsy Fischer / Jenne MacCagli7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Michelle Uhlenhake6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDawn Coleman / Mary Hutchinson vs Helen Ericson / Ginger Arthur6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Martin / Ann Brady vs Eileen Webster / Tugba Turnaoglu4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#4 DoublesAnna Taylor / Katherine Goodner vs Heather McKeehan / Jen Rose6-1, 6-4
2026-05-03vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesAngie Epps / Dawn Coleman vs Allison Chandler / Megan Haselschwerdt2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs LOURDES BLANDINO3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAmanda Smith / Ann Brady vs Kristine Jones / Tammy Shrivalle0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAnna Taylor / Libby Hicks vs Lisa Huffman / Paola Martinez2-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesCynthia Reed / Tina Thompson vs Melanie Johnson / Cindi Mooney7-5, 6-1
2026-04-19vs Nelson/KnoxvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJennifer Lea / Tina Thompson vs Tracy Collins / Shawn Mason6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Jennifer McVeigh4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Martin / Ann Brady vs Kimberly Nelson / Kristin Monge2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDawn Coleman / Mary Hutchinson vs Suzanne Mubarak / Jeanne Blake6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesElsa Roland / Libby Hicks vs Tamy Wilson / Stacey Wright1-6, 3-6
2026-04-12vs Maccagli/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesSusan Lahrs / Tina Thompson vs Sharie Gaby / Eileen Webster3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Karen Collins6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAngie Epps / Dawn Coleman vs Shelly Ren / Deborah Szwarc7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCynthia Reed / Ann Brady vs Patsy Fischer / Tugba Turnaoglu3-6, 6-7
L#4 DoublesElsa Roland / Katherine Goodner vs Heather McKeehan / Linda Bui5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-03-29vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesSusan Lahrs / Tina Thompson vs Debi English / Pamela Shirley1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs LOURDES BLANDINO2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lea / Ann Brady vs Angie Goodwyn / Rosa Luttrell3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Martin / Angie Epps vs Lisa Huffman / Paola Martinez6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#4 DoublesAnna Taylor / Libby Hicks vs Stacy Carlson / Megan Haselschwerdt3-6, 1-6
2026-03-22vs Nelson/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesCynthia Reed / Donna Walker vs Julie Harano / Kelly Hollingsworth4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Catalina Knutson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmanda Smith / Susan Lahrs vs Kristin Monge / Kimberly Nelson1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMary Hutchinson / Dawn Coleman vs Shawn Mason / Kate Watson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesAnna Taylor / Libby Hicks vs Jennifer McVeigh / Lucianne Price6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Susan Lahrs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Lori DeRoos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.10
Angie Epps
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Dawn Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.09
Cynthia Reed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Jennifer Lea
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.07
Tina Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Ann Brady
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.88
Elsa Roland
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Katherine Goodner
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.43
Libby Hicks
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Epps + Dawn Coleman62139% games−4.3% vs expected
Tina Thompson + Susan Lahrs0629% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Reed + Susan Lahrs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Lahrs
9W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Lori DeRoos
31W–30L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Angie Epps
16W–46L career · 7 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Dawn Coleman
11W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cynthia Reed
9W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jennifer Lea
23W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
Tina Thompson
3W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Ann Brady
8W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Elsa Roland
51W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
Katherine Goodner
10W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Libby Hicks
7W–30L career · 7 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.