Teams

LSupernavage (Raintree); High Strung

2024 Summer Doubles USTA Flex League · 2.5 Women; Evening

6 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesRebecca Plaisance / Donna Callinan vs Kelly Wolff / Marie Foley1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesRebecca Plaisance / Cami Teel vs Elizabeth Laur / Kelly Wolff1-6, 0-6
2024-07-17vs MSilla/JLang (BCC); SIX CHIXLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Plaisance / Cami Teel vs Michelle Silla / Libby Roberts1-6, 2-6
2024-06-25vs ASeufert (Raintree); Kiss our AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesKrista Gibson / Donna Callinan vs Anje Seufert / Kelly Wolff1-6, 5-7
2024-06-25vs MSilla/JLang (BCC); SIX CHIXLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Hall / Lucinda Supernavage vs Kristina Nichols / Melissa Davis6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-06-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Wolff / Lucinda Supernavage vs Krista Gibson / Adriana Hall2-6, 1-6
2024-06-13vs MSilla/JLang (BCC); SIX CHIXLost 01
L#1 DoublesKrista Gibson / Donna Callinan vs Kristina Nichols / Golin Kosowitz1-6, 4-6
2024-06-08vs ASeufert (Raintree); Kiss our AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLucinda Supernavage / Crystal Rowe vs Anje Seufert / Shannon Burke4-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesAdriana Hall / Donna Callinan vs Brooke Winkelman / Sheri Noot7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women; Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Adriana Hall
published 3
2.69
Krista Gibson
published
2.50
Donna Callinan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Rebecca Plaisance
published
2.26
Lucinda Supernavage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Cami Teel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Gibson + Donna Callinan5254% games+10.7% vs expected
Donna Callinan + Lucinda Supernavage314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adriana Hall
8W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
2.87
Krista Gibson
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%8%92%
2.69
2.5
Donna Callinan
46W–78L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%50%50%
2.50
Rebecca Plaisance
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Lucinda Supernavage
35W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Cami Teel
6W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.