Teams

HOCO-JONES

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-11-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMICHELLE BROWN / Blanton McGhee vs Tashelga Parrott / Damien Parrott0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA MXD 18 & Over - Winter Thursday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Shannon Hankins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Greg Landa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Tyler Burns
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Ashley Sanchez
published 3
2.90
Rolonda Gaskins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
MICHELLE BROWN
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Terry Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
April Lankford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Blanton McGhee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Brian Harper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Yeshwanth Rao Karkal
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Rodrigo Morales
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joseph Cecchini
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kevin Lankford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Harper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Neha Deopuria
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rolonda Gaskins + MICHELLE BROWN8654% games+4.7% vs expected
Kevin Lankford + April Lankford224 matchesnot enough data
Greg Landa + Shannon Hankins314 matchesnot enough data
Greg Landa + Terry Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Terry Jones + Tyler Burns123 matchesnot enough data
Yeshwanth Rao Karkal + Ashley Sanchez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Hankins
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Greg Landa
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tyler Burns
16W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Ashley Sanchez
26W–25L career · no lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Rolonda Gaskins
47W–42L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
MICHELLE BROWN
48W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Terry Jones
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
April Lankford
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Blanton McGhee
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Brian Harper
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Yeshwanth Rao Karkal
8W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Rodrigo Morales
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Joseph Cecchini
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Lankford
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Harper
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Neha Deopuria
9W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.