Teams

SSteffey (Southampton)

2024 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-01vs TThailer/PMullins (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKim Rivera / Pauline Styers vs Trudy Thailer / Patty Mullins0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-24vs KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)Won 20
W#1 DoublesEsther Craig / Christine Barnes vs Stephanie Rock / Alicia Fink6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAriel Burgoon / Pauline Styers vs Lindsey Ferguson / Sarah Garner6-1, 6-0
2024-04-17vs CCox (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Whitney Head vs Susan Chandler / Christine Demille6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-10vs JCohen (Blakeney)Won 20
W#1 DoublesPauline Styers / Kim Rivera vs Toni Escuder / Kelly Lull6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEsther Craig / Whitney Head vs Janet Cohen / Shikha Agrawal6-4, 6-4
2024-04-03vs MKelling/RJoplin (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPauline Styers / Kim Rivera vs Holly Bandel / Katie van Valkinburgh6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTeri Iezzi / Ariel Burgoon vs Mitchell Kelling / Brooke Leonnig1-6, 6-7
2024-03-20vs AHeath (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKim Rivera / Esther Craig vs Allison Purmort / Lauren Spanos6-0, 6-0
2024-03-13vs NBadr (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEsther Craig / Pauline Styers vs Lori DiFazio / Emma SEGAL6-7, 4-6
2024-03-13vs MEshleman (PPRSC)Won 20
W#2 DoublesPauline Styers / Elba Crasto vs Holly McClure / Marisa Haehnlein2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Barnes / Teri Iezzi vs Mary Oakley / Angela MacMurphy4-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Kim Rivera
published
3.50
Esther Craig
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Shelly Steffey
published
3.19
Holli High
published
3.10
Teri Iezzi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Pauline Styers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shelly Steffey + Pauline Styers1532% gamesnot enough data
Esther Craig + Holli High404 matchesnot enough data
Esther Craig + Teri Iezzi033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Rivera
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Esther Craig
113W–61L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Shelly Steffey
44W–35L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Holli High
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Teri Iezzi
110W–84L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
Pauline Styers
67W–88L career · 6 lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.93

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.