Teams

Michele Beach W8.5

2025 DALLAS TENNIS COMBO DOUBLES Weekend Event · W 8.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-24vs Enya He W8.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesAngela Avila / Sandy Mora vs Ryoko Suzuki / Edith Kruckmann6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela Kvale / Stephanie Prats vs Tiffini Williams / Enya He6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRebecca Neal / Kristen Volz vs Erin Lange / Tara Morgan2-6, 4-6
2025-08-23vs Martha DavisWon 21
W#1 DoublesSandy Mora / Angela Avila vs Shana Lazarine / Jackie Reily6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Neal / Rebecca Gunn vs Kate VandeBerghe / Judy Barbo7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Beach / Claudia Villegas vs Kelly Thornton / Michelle Behm7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-22vs Jessica Thota W8.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesSandy Mora / Pamela Kvale vs Melissa Holden / Christie Smith7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristen Volz / Michele Beach vs Megan Klauser / Sanella Wertz7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRebecca Gunn / Rebecca Neal vs Mary Allen / Jessica Thota7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for W 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Sandy Mora
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Angela Avila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Laura Lusk
published
4.00
Stephanie Prats
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Michele Beach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Pamela Kvale
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Claudia Villegas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Angela James
published 4
Kristen Volz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Gunn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Neal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Beach + Claudia Villegas213 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Villegas + Rebecca Neal213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Mora
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Angela Avila
36W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Laura Lusk
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
Stephanie Prats
6W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
4.00
Michele Beach
42W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Pamela Kvale
51W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Claudia Villegas
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Angela James
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.67
Kristen Volz
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Gunn
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Neal
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.