Teams

Maggin

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Winter Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-21vs DinerWon 10
W#1 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Ann Kopsidas vs Errin Matechak / Alexis Martin6-0, 7-6
2023-03-17vs Block/CopelandWon 10
W#3 DoublesMaureen Doyle / Keelin Gallagher vs Barbara Delaney / Linda Wimsatt7-5, 6-1
2023-02-21vs PortoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnn Kopsidas / Keelin Gallagher vs Cheryl Hays / Christina Mendelson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-02-01vs Koele/CallahanWon 10
W#3 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Amy Heimberg vs Cintya Leveque / Laura Haney6-4, 6-3
2023-01-26vs Point BreakersWon 10
W#2 DoublesKeelin Gallagher / Lori Clogg vs Shirley Hsieh-Lau / Sherry Altman6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
JEAN HARVEY
published 4
Anna Maggin
published 4
3.73
Keelin Gallagher
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Ann Kopsidas
published 4
3.70
Laurie Stien
published
3.60
Kary Magruder
published
3.55
Lori Clogg
published
Cameron Caskin
published 3.5
Debbie Senker
published 3.5
Lisa Rudden
published
Nancy Eisner
published
Rebecca Sirody
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Clogg + Kary Magruder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
JEAN HARVEY
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Anna Maggin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Keelin Gallagher
77W–25L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Ann Kopsidas
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Laurie Stien
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Kary Magruder
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.60
Lori Clogg
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Cameron Caskin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Debbie Senker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Rudden
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Eisner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Sirody
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.