Teams

EASOM

2026 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 3.0 Men 40 & Over

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-01vs Serkin 40+ SinglesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCraig Barber vs Paul Cairney6-1, 6-2
L#3 SinglesVictor Morgan vs David Haslam2-6, 0-6
2026-02-20vs BROACHWon 21
W#1 SinglesCraig Barber vs KELLY WHITE6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBrent Priddy vs Jarrett Davis6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesVictor Morgan vs Tom Downen2-6, 4-6
2026-02-19vs BROACHSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrent Priddy vs Glenn Byrd6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesVictor Morgan vs KELLY WHITE2-6, 2-6
2026-02-19vs BROACHLost 12
L#1 SinglesGreg Malone vs KELLY WHITE6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBrent Priddy vs Glenn Byrd6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesVictor Morgan vs Jarrett Davis3-6, 4-6
2026-02-15vs Serkin 40+ SinglesLost 12
W#1 SinglesGreg Malone vs Paul Cairney6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrent Priddy vs David Haslam3-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesVictor Morgan vs Scott Serkin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-02-01vs Serkin 40+ SinglesWon 21
L#1 SinglesVictor Morgan vs Dave Baxter0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGreg Malone vs David Haslam6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesMarshall Cooper vs Stuart Moore6-4, 6-1
2026-01-20vs Serkin 40+ SinglesLost 12
L#1 SinglesVictor Morgan vs Stuart Moore3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesCraig Barber vs Scott Serkin6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesLuke Menius vs Ramon Aristy1-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs BROACHWon 30
W#1 SinglesGreg Malone vs Jarrett Davis6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesCraig Barber vs KELLY WHITE6-3, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBrent Priddy vs Glenn Byrd6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Jon Easom
published
3.07
Greg Malone
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.99
Craig Barber
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.96
Marshall Cooper
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.73
Brent Priddy
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.59
Victor Morgan
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Luke Menius
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Ted Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Easom + Ted Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Easom
26W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Greg Malone
45W–38L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Craig Barber
35W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
Marshall Cooper
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Brent Priddy
7W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Victor Morgan
0W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Luke Menius
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Ted Smith
18W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.