Teams

Haugh - Highland Country Club

2025 Sandhills Adult 55 & over · 3.0 Senior Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-07vs Jones - MazarickWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Keller / Laurie Cherry vs Donna Pope / Peggy Schaefer6-4, 6-0
2025-04-23vs Montesi Yates - Pinehurst ResortWon 10
W#1 DoublesMurtis Worth / Lauren Blashford vs Vilma Mendez / Anne Weiss6-1, 6-4
2025-04-16vs Jones - MazarickSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMurtis Worth / Lauren Blashford vs Sarah Hallock / Wendy Vonnegut6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMartha Lerario / Laurie Cherry vs Jacqui Cannon / Angela Daniel6-3, 6-3
2025-04-02vs Montesi Yates - Pinehurst ResortSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTammy Keller / Corinna Williamson vs Maya Callaghan / Anne Weiss6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMurtis Worth / Laurie Cherry vs Sondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-03-26vs Jones - MazarickWon 30
W#1 DoublesTammy Keller / Eydie Hammaker vs Sarah Hallock / Hannah Ha6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Wilson / Denise O'Dell vs Jackie Foley / Theresa Jones6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Haugh / Sharon Williford vs Mari Lesniak / Jacqui Cannon1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Jones - MazarickWon 20
W#1 DoublesEydie Hammaker / Lauren Blashford vs Theresa Jones / Peggy Schaefer1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCorinna Williamson / Murtis Worth vs Donna Pope / Hannah Ha6-3, 6-2
2025-03-12vs Montesi Yates - Pinehurst ResortWon 10
W#1 DoublesTammy Keller / Lauren Blashford vs Kelly Rader / Maya Callaghan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Montesi Yates - Pinehurst ResortWon 20
W#2 DoublesLauren Blashford / Murtis Worth vs Anne Weiss / Maya Callaghan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCorinna Williamson / Sharon Williford vs Sondra Montesi Yates / Jamie Moss6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Senior Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Laurie Cherry
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Murtis Worth
published
2.92
Lauren Blashford
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.90
Corinna Williamson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Tammy Keller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Eydie Hammaker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Denise O'Dell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Martha Lerario
published
2.49
Sharon Williford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Mary Haugh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Monroe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corinna Williamson + Tammy Keller3257% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Cherry + Lauren Blashford2349% gamesnot enough data
Murtis Worth + Eydie Hammaker3256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laurie Cherry
93W–106L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Murtis Worth
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Lauren Blashford
106W–102L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Corinna Williamson
122W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Tammy Keller
24W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Eydie Hammaker
14W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Denise O'Dell
16W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Martha Lerario
10W–29L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Sharon Williford
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Mary Haugh
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Laura Monroe
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.