Teams

Team Sabasteanski

2021 NOVA Mixed 55 & Over · Mixed 55 & Over 8.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.86 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Geoffrey Montgomery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Mark Matsko
published
3.78
3.77
Sonia Valdes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Anita Wilson
published 4
3.56
Gail Douglass
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.55
Robert Luftglass
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Julie Seraphin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Sol Lopez
published
3.47
Rosemary McEnery
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.38
Sharon Sabasteanski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Elliot Rogers
published 3.5
Ben Moss
published 3.5
3.21
Margaret Rubino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Ronald Oberbillig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geoffrey Montgomery + Kay Bransford11455% games−5.6% vs expected
Geoffrey Montgomery + Anita Wilson3256% gamesnot enough data
Geoffrey Montgomery + Margaret Rubino134 matchesnot enough data
Sharon Sabasteanski + Robert Luftglass213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Luftglass + Sonia Valdes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Geoffrey Montgomery
320W–242L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.84
Mark Matsko
8W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Everett Diederiks
19W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Sonia Valdes
348W–174L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Jacques Beaudry-Losique
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 3 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Anita Wilson
33W–41L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Gail Douglass
117W–174L career · 3 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Robert Luftglass
69W–94L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
4
Julie Seraphin
67W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.50
Sol Lopez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
4
Rosemary McEnery
64W–113L career · 2 lines in 2021
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Sharon Sabasteanski
255W–176L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Elliot Rogers
18W–16L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.34
3.5
Ben Moss
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Margaret Rubino
78W–148L career · 2 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.21
Ronald Oberbillig
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.