Teams

BC-PVTC/PeterMalishka

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Men - 4.5

14 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Men - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Stephen Matuszeski
published 4.5
4.31
Andrew Chekian
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4.5
4.26
William Konya
published
4.22
Jay Jackson
published
4.18
Chad MacAllister
published 4.5
4.17
Kurt Kredel
published
4.11
Stephen Amstutz
published
3.93
Kenneth Park
published
3.86
Richard Butlig
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.84
Peter Malishka
published
3.79
Andy Frommenwiler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Jason Sikola
published
Jeffrey Carberry
published
Roland Rietz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Chekian + Kurt Kredel21853% games+2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephen Matuszeski
44W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
4.49
4.5
Andrew Chekian
111W–64L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
4.31
William Konya
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Jay Jackson
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Chad MacAllister
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
Kurt Kredel
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Stephen Amstutz
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
4.11
Kenneth Park
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Richard Butlig
101W–49L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Peter Malishka
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Andy Frommenwiler
99W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Jason Sikola
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Carberry
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Roland Rietz
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.