Teams

LLAS UPTA65A/Smith/Spindletree

65 & Over · 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-13vs LATA65/Robbins/SSPWon 21
L#1 DoublesRobert Medlin / Roland Fournier vs Gary Bible / John McCoy2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKirk Villar / Tipton Bradford vs Stan Gooding / Tom Wright6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Prier / Robert Jerdan vs Leon Freeman / Richard Robbins4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-13vs LCTA65/Lee/MPRWon 30
W#1 DoublesLarry Smith / Jerry Kortenber vs Clay Claiborne / Russell Lacoste6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKirk Villar / Tipton Bradford vs Samuel Bennett / Richard Weathers6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Medlin / Roland Fournier vs Charles Lee / Leonard Douglas6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-10-12vs HHTL65/Luba/Port RoyalWon 30
W#1 DoublesKirk Villar / Tipton Bradford vs Daniel Spar / Jim Mansfield6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobert Jerdan / David Prier vs Thomas Aholt / Edward Hersperger6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLarry Smith / Jerry Kortenber vs Richard Silver / Eddie Goodson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over LLAS - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Jerry Kortenber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Kirk Villar
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Tipton Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
David Prier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.53
Robert Jerdan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.47
Roland Fournier
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Robert Medlin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tipton Bradford + Kirk Villar5748% games−2.9% vs expected
Robert Medlin + Roland Fournier134 matchesnot enough data
David Prier + Robert Jerdan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Kortenber
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
Kirk Villar
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Tipton Bradford
23W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
23%76%<1%
3.60
4
David Prier
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Robert Jerdan
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.53
Roland Fournier
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
Robert Medlin
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.