Teams

Cheval Kings - J. Knierman

2021 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL - Men · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-11-21vs HCC Vamos - J. OrsiniSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTodd Abrams / Andrew Roig vs Enrique Escobar / Ernie Pabon4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRoger Bensinger / Darin Garner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2020-11-14vs Tampa Yacht White - A. CarricatoLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Knierman / Andrew Roig vs Grant Garlick / Brian Berling7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2020-11-07vs Tampa Yacht White - A. CarricatoLost 02
L#1 DoublesDarin Garner / Todd Abrams vs Grant Garlick / William Mueller4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Knierman / Andrew Roig vs Taylor Garland / James Lass6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2020-10-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Roig / Stephen McCormick vs Paul Williams / Jagan Punjal4-6, 1-6
2020-10-24vs HCC Vamos - J. OrsiniLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Bensinger / Darin Garner vs Ernie Pabon / Enrique Escobar4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndrew Roig / Jason Crow vs Jean-Claude Dallies / Aditya Deshpande3-6, 4-6
2020-10-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Knierman / Darin Garner vs Ross Feldman / David Jeakle7-5, 6-4
2020-10-03vs Buckhorn BallersWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohn Knierman / Andrew Roig vs Javid Lateef - (DQ) / Ken Chin6-2, 6-1
2020-09-26vs SVB Guys Playing Tennis - J. CoteySplit 11
L#1 DoublesJason Crow / Andrew Roig vs Michael Bitting / Erik Hajek3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRoger Bensinger / Darin Garner vs Quyen Nguyen / Gregory Morrissey6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Andrew Roig
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.85
Amer Aldeen
published 4
3.64
Todd Abrams
published
3.52
Darin Garner
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jason Crow
published
Sundar Srinivasan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Roig + Amer Aldeen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Roig
57W–48L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Amer Aldeen
13W–8L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
Todd Abrams
11W–12L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Darin Garner
104W–81L career · 5 lines in 2021
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jason Crow
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sundar Srinivasan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.