Teams

LOS GATOS SR 18AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

23 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Lauren Denevi
published
3.49
Jing Welch
published
3.42
Emily Burns
published
3.41
Pauline Teunissen
published
3.40
Charla Serbent
published 3.5
3.37
Ellie Gholami
published
3.34
Lisa Baumert
published
3.28
Lorraine Mc Carthy
published
3.26
Rhonda Mahendroo
published
3.22
Jennifer Haggerty
published
3.17
Mary Jo Lee
published
3.17
Amy Beth Hansman
published 3.5
3.01
Sheila Hutchinson
published
3.00
Lauren Kutting
published
2.99
Michelle Yoo
published
2.92
Zhen Liu
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Julie Schwarz
published
2.83
Ko-Yun Chen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Catherine Pham
published 3.5
2.69
Sharon Elder
published
2.50
Aviva Garrett
published 3
Katie McBride
published
Sherry Keogh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pauline Teunissen + Lisa Baumert2443% games−9.0% vs expected
Ellie Gholami + Julie Schwarz4255% gamesnot enough data
Lorraine Mc Carthy + Lisa Baumert224 matchesnot enough data
Amy Beth Hansman + Pauline Teunissen314 matchesnot enough data
Sheila Hutchinson + Sharon Elder123 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Denevi + Lisa Baumert303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Haggerty + Pauline Teunissen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Denevi
39W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Jing Welch
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Emily Burns
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Pauline Teunissen
21W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Charla Serbent
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.40
Ellie Gholami
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Lisa Baumert
34W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Lorraine Mc Carthy
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Rhonda Mahendroo
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jennifer Haggerty
17W–17L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Mary Jo Lee
10W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Amy Beth Hansman
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Sheila Hutchinson
13W–30L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Lauren Kutting
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Michelle Yoo
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Zhen Liu
27W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Julie Schwarz
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Ko-Yun Chen
13W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3.5
Catherine Pham
16W–33L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
Sharon Elder
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Aviva Garrett
6W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
Katie McBride
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Keogh
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.