Teams

Greenway

2026 CVTA Southern Combo 18 & Over - Summer · Women 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-16vs MasonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLucky Chan / Amber King vs Pam Mills / MacI Mills5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKimberly Brown / Brooke Greenway vs Catrina Mashburn / Tara McFarlane6-7, 6-7
2026-07-09vs AndersonWon 21
L#1 DoublesKailey Beth Treglown / Rachel Ragland vs Kit Stockton / Dawn Paxten3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDawn Wright / Brooke Greenway vs Kate Smith / Jessica Carney6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichelle Arp / Henriette Medina vs Mary Andersen / Carolyn Rusiecki4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-06vs MorganWon 21
W#1 DoublesLesa Dixon / Brooke Greenway vs Debbie Maxwell / Constance Fallin6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Arp / Amber King vs Julia Johnson / Denise Smith7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDawn Wright / Donna Atkins vs Mollie Locke / Caleigh Schroeder6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-02vs CargleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Brown / Angela Evans vs Pamela Peal / Sarah Cargle6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Amber King vs Yanlin Ai / Kathleen Wolfe4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Blair Addison / Henriette Medina vs Christie Westall / Jennifer Hunt2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-24vs MorganWon 21
W#1 DoublesRebecca Blair Addison / Amber King vs Cami Marcus / Nena Marcus6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Blackburn / Lesa Dixon vs Constance Fallin / April Chastain6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKimberly Brown / Donna Atkins vs Denise Smith / Kerrigan LeBoeuf6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-11vs MasonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRebecca Blair Addison / Henriette Medina vs Tara McFarlane / Sarah Arthur1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Wright / Rachel Ragland vs Jenna Thomas / Catrina Mashburn1-6, 1-4
L#3 DoublesLucky Chan / Amber King vs MacI Mills / Pam Mills7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-06-04vs AndersonWon 30
W#1 DoublesLesa Dixon / Brooke Greenway vs Mary Andersen / Jessica Carney6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKailey Beth Treglown / Amber King vs Dawn Paxten / Kit Stockton6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAngela Evans / Rachel Ragland vs Ali Freeman / Carolyn Rusiecki7-5, 6-4
2026-05-28vs CargleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Brown / Donna Blackburn vs Haleigh Allario / Christina Ellis6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Greenway / Lucky Chan vs Amy Mitchell / Pamela Peal6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKailey Beth Treglown / Rachel Ragland vs Jennifer Odom / Kathleen Wolfe1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Rebecca Blair Addison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Dawn Wright
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Lucky Chan
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
3.10
Michelle Arp
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Lesa Dixon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Kailey Beth Treglown
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Amber King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
Donna Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.58
Angela Evans
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Brooke Greenway
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published 3
2.53
Henriette Medina
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
Rachel Ragland
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Donna Blackburn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Greenway + Lesa Dixon4744% games+4.7% vs expected
Henriette Medina + Brooke Greenway404 matchesnot enough data
Kailey Beth Treglown + Lesa Dixon224 matchesnot enough data
Donna Blackburn + Angela Evans123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Blair Addison
7W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
3.5
Dawn Wright
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Lucky Chan
29W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.19
Michelle Arp
26W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.10
Lesa Dixon
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kailey Beth Treglown
22W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Amber King
17W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
Donna Atkins
13W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Angela Evans
18W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
2.58
3
Brooke Greenway
25W–37L career · 11 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
2.57
Henriette Medina
10W–21L career · 9 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Rachel Ragland
10W–31L career · 9 lines in 2026
77%23%<1%
2.40
Donna Blackburn
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.