Teams

(13) Brookhaven/Heldmar W4.0S

2022 DTA N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

15 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Cecilia Hernandez
published 4.5
3.88
Daniella Bowling
published 4
3.77
Kathryn Idoux
published
3.67
Elizabeth Chao
published 4
3.65
Tera Lockwood
published
3.56
Hope Heldmar
published 3.5
3.41
Karen Saland
published
Denise Lytle
published 3.5
3.14
Kathleen Dodgen
published
Kathy Engelbrecht
published
Melissa Brueningsen
published
Molly Jahn
published
Renee Haygood
published
Shawn Ward
published
Suzette Fenton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Chao + Kathryn Idoux6254% games+1.8% vs expected
Renee Haygood + Shawn Ward224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cecilia Hernandez
9W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Daniella Bowling
11W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
Kathryn Idoux
14W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Elizabeth Chao
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Tera Lockwood
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Hope Heldmar
22W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.56
Karen Saland
15W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Denise Lytle
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathleen Dodgen
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Kathy Engelbrecht
2W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Brueningsen
7W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Jahn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Haygood
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shawn Ward
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzette Fenton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.