Teams

4.5 Westwood Godsey WKEND

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.58 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-30vs Powhatan 4.5 Tennisbums - KelleyWon 20
W#1 DoublesSeth Feibelman / Daniel Tobben vs James Atchison / Judah Alter6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHenry Singleton vs Martin Varys6-3, 6-1
2025-04-27vs MRTC Battery Park - Spivack WKENDWon 41
W#1 DoublesPatrick Gee / Fred Walker vs Alex Nadeau / Jimmy Qing6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJeffreys Harrell vs Tom Lewis3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Hobbs / Brian Rowe vs Wayne Motley / Eric Spivack1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesWill Hart vs Tucker Ottaway3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRaymond Kanyo / Todd Prince vs Stuart McCroskey / Wheeler Dey6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Patrick Gee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.51
Seth Feibelman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.46
Jack Allen
published 5
4.46
Brian Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.42
Fred Walker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Robert Quinn
published
4.34
William Hobbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Paul Caldwell
published
Aaron Paul
published 4.5
Henry Singleton
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Todd Prince
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.23
Ryan Baker
published
4.21
Richard Godsey
published
4.14
Daniel Tobben
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Jeffreys Harrell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Raymond Kanyo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Will Hart
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Gee
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.62
Seth Feibelman
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.51
5
Jack Allen
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Brian Rowe
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Fred Walker
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
4.42
Robert Quinn
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.34
William Hobbs
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
Paul Caldwell
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Aaron Paul
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Henry Singleton
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Todd Prince
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Baker
29W–11L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Richard Godsey
8W–0L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
Daniel Tobben
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
4.14
Jeffreys Harrell
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Kanyo
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Will Hart
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.