Teams

Gadsden 4.0/3.5/3.0 Ford

2026 Anniston · Gadsden

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-14Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJon Ford / Jerry Tinsley vs Scott Reynolds / Brett Wilborn5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJeremy Burns / Alex Dhionis vs Tyler Harrell / Ramesh Chellamuthi5-7, 2-6
2026-06-30Won 20
W#2 DoublesJerry Tinsley / Patrick Denney vs Jon Ford Jr / Scott Reynolds7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeremy Burns / Alex Dhionis vs Tyler Harrell / Ramesh Chellamuthi7-6, 7-6
2026-06-23Split 11
L#2 DoublesJon Ford / Jerry Tinsley vs Brandon Gore / Scott Reynolds3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAlex Dhionis / Jeremy Burns vs Ramesh Chellamuthi / Brett Wilborn7-5, 7-6
2026-06-09vs Gadsden 4.0/3.5/3.0 Ford Jr.Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJerry Tinsley / John Chambless vs Scott Reynolds / Alan Kwan3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJimmy Warren / Jon Ford vs Jon Ford Jr / Ramesh Chellamuthi1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Denney / Alex Dhionis vs Tyler Harrell / Brett Wilborn3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Gadsden
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gadsden 4.0/3.5/3.0 Ford Jr.317510107
2Gadsden 4.0/3.5/3.0 Ford133918144

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Jimmy Warren
published
3.08
Patrick Denney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.04
Jeremy Burns
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Alex Dhionis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jerry Tinsley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
John Chambless
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jon Ford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Dhionis + Jeremy Burns213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jimmy Warren
25W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Patrick Denney
43W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Jeremy Burns
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
2.5
Alex Dhionis
4W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Jerry Tinsley
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Chambless
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jon Ford
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.