Teams

The Forest Lowe

2023 LeeCharlotte Adult 18 & Over Spring Weeknight · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women - Night

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-12vs Renaissance SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Mary Witham vs Pat Kidd / Jo Ann Grantham0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Mary Witham vs Wanda Bierbrauer / Trisha Farrell7-6, 7-6
2023-05-22vs LeeChar/Douglass/18&Over3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Zoe Lefort vs Alisha Daines / Sarah Catala7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-15vs Renaissance SmithWon 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Diana Provence vs Pat Kidd / Linda Sisco6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Candace Schecter vs Rita Brown / Susan Hoffman6-2, 6-1
2023-05-01vs LeeChar/Douglass/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Damaris Schneider vs Sarah Catala / Lisa DeLauder2-6, 4-6
2023-04-24vs Renaissance SmithLost 01
L#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Mary Witham vs Pat Kidd / Linda Sisco6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-17vs Rutenberg BrownLost 01
L#1 DoublesDamaris Schneider / Dorothy Waldron vs Christy Jo Ellis / Susan Hoffman4-6, 4-6
2023-04-10vs LeeChar/Douglass/18&Over3.0WWon 10
W#1 DoublesDorothy Waldron / Diana Provence vs Sylvia Lamantia / Denise Vaccaro7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Zoe Lefort
published
3.25
Dorothy Waldron
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 3.5
2.95
Mary Lowe
published
2.92
Mary Witham
published
2.86
Candace Schecter
published 3
2.82
Ann Difilippo
published 3
Diana Provence
published 3
2.70
Claudia Rands
published 3
2.57
Carolyn Krause
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Difilippo + Mary Lowe5060% games+11.0% vs expected
Dorothy Waldron + Candace Schecter134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zoe Lefort
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Dorothy Waldron
88W–70L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Mary Lowe
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.95
Mary Witham
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Candace Schecter
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Ann Difilippo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Diana Provence
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Claudia Rands
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Carolyn Krause
2W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.