Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Nelson

2022 So Cal Fall Doubles - San Diego · SD Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-28vs SD LLW 3.0 Coronado TC/ KimballLost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Tabitha Anderson vs Katerina Hart / Erin Enrico0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKarin Copp / Amy Holzer vs Jessica Cunningham / Tara Toohey3-6, 4-6
2022-10-31vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Yu-HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Karin Copp vs Gretchen Shaffer / Sarah Schultzel4-6, 3-6
2022-10-24vs SD 3.0 Mountain View/ IbarraLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Holzer / Claudia Nelson vs Sara Fairbank / Celina Tiznado0-6, 1-6
2022-10-17vs SD LLW 3.0 Coronado TC/ KimballLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Claudia Nelson vs Katerina Hart / Erin Enrico0-6, 1-6
2022-10-03vs SD 3.0 Mountain View/ IbarraLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jennie Vandenakker vs Priscila Silva / CRISTINA CORONA3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Holzer / Karin Copp vs Martha Khoury / Terri Lundberg4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-09-19vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Yu-HansenLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarin Copp / Amy Holzer vs Gretchen Shaffer / Elizabeth Yu-Hansen2-6, 1-6
2022-09-12vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC/ WoodLost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Jennie Vandenakker vs Lisa Carey / Julie Wood4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Katie Herrick
published
2.95
Karin Copp
published
2.80
Amy Holzer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.76
Claudia Nelson
published 3
2.66
Laura Stacy
published
2.56
Perla Wall
published
Joi Catlin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Holzer + Karin Copp3251% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Katie Herrick
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
Karin Copp
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Amy Holzer
80W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Claudia Nelson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Laura Stacy
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
2.66
Perla Wall
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
Joi Catlin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.