Teams

Wallman/Bella Vista/KTC

2024 Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-28vs Crum/Springdale/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesPeter Ritchie / Stuart Vess vs Terry Murphy / Herbert Crum6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJim Denno / John Zapp vs Val Robison / Mike Horsman6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLou Wallman / Kevin Shanahan vs Jon Adams / Stephen Adams0-6, 1-6
2024-09-28vs DGarretson/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesPeter Ritchie / Stuart Vess vs Edward Barbot / Mike Ritch4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Zapp / Jim Denno vs Chuck Brown / Doug Williams6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDennis Jones / Kevin Shanahan vs David Robinson / Bobby Ring1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-09-27vs Magee/Esmaeilpour/LRWon 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Ritchie / David Zago vs William Hawkins / Don Dobbins6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJohn Zapp / Kevin Shanahan vs Elliot Esmaeilpour / Kevin Dugan3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJim Denno / Stuart Vess vs Pete Owens / Ricky Holder3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
John Zapp
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
David Zago
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jim Denno
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Shanahan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lou Wallman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Peter Ritchie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stuart Vess
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Ritchie + David Zago6553% games+3.9% vs expected
John Zapp + Jim Denno4458% games+1.3% vs expected
Lou Wallman + Jim Denno134 matchesnot enough data
Lou Wallman + David Zago224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Zapp
12W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
David Zago
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Jim Denno
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kevin Shanahan
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lou Wallman
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Peter Ritchie
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stuart Vess
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.