Teams

4-hands, BATKINS & vol-LEEs 4.5

2022 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over Winter · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.72 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-31vs Kicking AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesErika Trost / Danielle Desfosses vs Natalie Eatedali / Kay Bransford6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-03-26vs Kicking AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNita Elie / Danielle Desfosses vs Alice Ling / Kay Bransford4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMalika Rasheed / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Simone Feldman / Jennifer McGraw3-6, 2-6
2022-03-16vs Kicking AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesNita Elie / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Dana MacHer / Jennifer McGraw1-6, 4-6
2022-03-10vs Kicking AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele Brammer / Danielle Desfosses vs Patricia Bibes / Mary Winicour6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDao Phan-Vissering / Angel Batkins vs Anne Jagodits / Simone Feldman7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMalika Rasheed / Erika Trost vs Jennifer McGraw / Kay Bransford6-7, 6-7
2022-03-01vs Kicking AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesDava Baumann / Erika Trost vs Leah Noonan / Mary Winicour6-1, 6-3
2022-02-19vs Kicking AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlison Bailey / Erika Trost vs Alice Ling / Simone Feldman6-0, 6-3
2022-02-07vs Kicking AcesLost 01
L#3 DoublesErika Trost / Nita Elie vs Mary Winicour / Kerrie Jenkins5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2022-01-28vs Kicking AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesInese Williamson / Dao Phan-Vissering vs Natalie Eatedali / Janet Szamosszegi6-4, 6-2
2022-01-20vs Kicking AcesWon 10
W#3 DoublesLaura Smith / Erika Trost vs Dana MacHer / Alice Ling6-4, 7-5
2022-01-10vs Kicking AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlison Bailey / Erika Trost vs Catalina Tafur / Patricia Bibes6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.07
Inese Williamson
published 5
4.79
Angel Batkins
published 5
4.58
Erika Trost
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 5
4.46
Danielle Desfosses
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.46
Caryn Vollmer
published 4.5
4.32
Dava Baumann
published 4.5
Crystal Cornell
published 4.5
4.18
Michele Brammer
published
4.04
Alison Bailey
published 4.5
3.93
Dao Phan-Vissering
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jessica Lee
published
Laura Smith
published
Malika Rasheed
published
Nita Elie
published
Wendy Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dava Baumann + Danielle Desfosses224 matchesnot enough data
Angel Batkins + Danielle Desfosses303 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Desfosses + Erika Trost123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Inese Williamson
28W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
5.07
5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.79
5
Erika Trost
383W–194L career · 7 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
4.58
5
Danielle Desfosses
131W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Caryn Vollmer
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
4.46
4.5
Dava Baumann
33W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Crystal Cornell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Alison Bailey
23W–23L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
4.04
4.5
Dao Phan-Vissering
232W–272L career · 4 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Smith
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Malika Rasheed
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nita Elie
0W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wendy Carey
7W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.