Teams

CTC Castle

2025 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-05vs CTC ElliotLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Steele / Jimmie Baker vs Mary Bulriss / Taylor Rose1-6, 2-6
2025-03-21vs TVTC PorterSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAnna Broverman / Kimberly Nelson vs Caroline Green / McKay Mignault6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDee Payne / Elizabeth Castle vs Carol Porter / Amy Davis3-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs TVTC PorterWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnna Broverman / Dee Payne vs McKay Mignault / Donna Mooney2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-02-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDee Payne vs Kristin Warner7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · SPRING A18&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTC Castle0431329180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dee Payne
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Gina Ratrie
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Jimmie Baker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Allison Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Elizabeth Castle
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Anna Broverman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Roth
published
Michelle Steele
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Castle + Gina Ratrie5066% gamesnot enough data
Dee Payne + Elizabeth Castle314 matchesnot enough data
Dee Payne + Allison Ballard303 matchesnot enough data
Allison Ballard + Gina Ratrie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dee Payne
36W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Gina Ratrie
51W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jimmie Baker
27W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
4
Allison Ballard
77W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
4
Elizabeth Castle
42W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
Anna Broverman
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Roth
22W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Steele
15W–16L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.