Teams

Challengers

2022 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-07vs JenLost 13
W#1 DoublesSusan Brunner / Barbara Jacobs vs Cynthia Henie / Kathy McArthur6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLori Kaltenbach vs Conita Mullett1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoaquita Martin / Bonnie Wickham vs Song Bliss / Kathryn Spils2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Savage / Sandra Denton vs Jennifer Duclos / Rosemarie Rotunno3-6, 5-7
2022-05-07vs JenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Brunner / Lori Kaltenbach vs Cynthia Henie / Kathy McArthur6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Savage / Sandra Denton vs Conita Mullett / Rosemarie Rotunno1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJoaquita Martin / Bonnie Wickham vs Sherry Sedwick / Song Bliss0-6, 0-6
2022-05-06vs JenLost 12
L#1 DoublesBarbara Jacobs / Bonnie Wickham vs Cynthia Henie / Kathy McArthur0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSusan Brunner vs Kathryn Spils3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Denton / Karen Savage vs Jennifer Duclos / Sherry Sedwick1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jen301051187
2Challengers0321328176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Lori Kaltenbach
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.02
Susan Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Barbara Jacobs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Bonnie Wickham
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Joaquita Martin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Savage
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Denton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Savage + Sandra Denton1731% games−13.8% vs expected
Joaquita Martin + Bonnie Wickham1627% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Jacobs + Susan Brunner123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Brunner + Lori Kaltenbach123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lori Kaltenbach
74W–57L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Susan Brunner
112W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Barbara Jacobs
21W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Bonnie Wickham
13W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joaquita Martin
3W–28L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Savage
6W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Denton
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.