Teams

LOS PASEOS PK CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-28vs CUPERTINO TC/CUPERTINO SC CM7.5CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndre Nodem / Akrit Mohapatra vs Artur Gainullin / Hank Wang4-6, 3-6
2025-09-21vs MORGAN HILL TC CM7.5AWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Nguyen / Art Biagtan vs Manish Nautiyal / Ric Andres3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesQuocbao Lenguyen / Giang Nguyen vs Raymond Molina / Dan Liang6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDanny Suarez / Frederick Raniel vs Viet Trinh / David Tran6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Andre Nodem
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Danny Suarez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Ben D Ta
published 4
3.75
Chris Chi Truong
published 4
3.74
Ken Cat Nguyen
published
3.70
Tung Do
published
3.69
Nathaniel Tumaneng
published
3.64
Robert Inocencio
published
3.51
Frederick Raniel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Giang Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Thinh Nguyen
published
3.42
Art Biagtan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Leon Nguyen
published
3.33
Kourosh Younesi
published
3.28
Minh Lam
published
3.27
Perry Lim
published
3.23
Lu Truong
published
Hao Dong
published
Quocbao Lenguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Cat Nguyen + Tung Do213 matchesnot enough data
Art Biagtan + Giang Nguyen213 matchesnot enough data
Art Biagtan + Leon Nguyen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andre Nodem
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%40%60%
4.04
4
Danny Suarez
15W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Ben D Ta
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Chris Chi Truong
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Ken Cat Nguyen
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Tung Do
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Nathaniel Tumaneng
15W–2L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Robert Inocencio
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.64
Frederick Raniel
12W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Giang Nguyen
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Thinh Nguyen
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Art Biagtan
15W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Leon Nguyen
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kourosh Younesi
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Minh Lam
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Perry Lim
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Lu Truong
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Hao Dong
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Quocbao Lenguyen
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.