Teams

Craig, John

2024 Adult Mixed 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 7.0 Mixed - 55&Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-04vs HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Goins / Troy Thomasson vs Shashi Bhat / Delane Cohen5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeff Nelson / Jill Bail vs Roy True / Jacqui Jensen7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Marks / Marcia Jacelone vs RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU / Stacie Temple2-6, 4-6
2024-09-13vs HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXDWon 30
W#1 DoublesJOHN CRAIG / Suzanne Shapland vs RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU / Jacqui Jensen6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Nelson / Jill Bail vs Jeffrey Asbell / Karen Luchinsky6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRandall Jensen / Susan Murphy vs John Evatt / Candace Herman6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0 Mixed - 55&Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Asbell/55&over7.0 MXD5112614145
2Craig, John3310817148
3Schmitz, Neil2471124172
4Curtis, Brian2471126185

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Mark McDonald
published
3.25
Troy Thomasson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jill Bail
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
JOHN CRAIG
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Randall Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Marcia Jacelone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Suzanne Shapland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Susan Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Sheila Goins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Beth Strader
published 3
Jeff Nelson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Nelson + Susan Murphy314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark McDonald
80W–63L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Troy Thomasson
31W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Jill Bail
86W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.24
JOHN CRAIG
104W–91L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
Randall Jensen
47W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Marcia Jacelone
49W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Suzanne Shapland
59W–92L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
Susan Murphy
80W–130L career · 1 line in 2024
56%44%<1%
2.98
Sheila Goins
45W–99L career · 1 line in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.94
3
Beth Strader
27W–50L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
Jeff Nelson
23W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.