Teams

Sweet Spots

2022 55&Over Women · 8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.58 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-10vs CapenhurstWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rasp-Glose / Katalin Mechtler vs Adrianna Boyczuk / Karen Ricciardi6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesValerie Elvin / Amy Moore vs Linda Capenhurst / Carol Salvatore6-7, 5-4
W#3 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Helen Marlette vs Cheryl Turner / Shirley Weisenborn7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-03vs Buff: Hughes/BrennanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Jane Gens vs June Brennan / Claudia Smolinski6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesValerie Elvin / Shuman Hua vs Teresa Arena / Rowena de Perio6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKatalin Mechtler / Cheryl Athoe vs Nancy Rehak / Mary Ann Grande2-6, 3-6
2022-07-27vs MonczynskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrea Abels / Dee Dee Fisher vs Amy Stohl / Michelle Plimpton4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Gens / Mary-Ann Jolley vs Alice Curtiss / Diane Gardner6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Moore / Valerie Elvin vs Laurie Krajna / Heather Harmon6-3, 7-6
2022-07-20vs CapenhurstLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Jane Gens vs Linda Capenhurst / Julia Matthews6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesValerie Elvin / Amy Moore vs Shirley Weisenborn / Cheryl Turner6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCheryl Athoe / Dee Dee Fisher vs Carol Salvatore / Ann Fonfara5-7, 1-6
2022-07-13vs Buff: Hughes/BrennanLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Rasp-Glose / Kathleen Banks vs Jan Coleman / Michele McGrath2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShuman Hua / Valerie Elvin vs Rowena de Perio / Silva Banboukian Serghany7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHelen Marlette / Mary-Ann Jolley vs June Brennan / Mary Ann Grande4-6, 4-6
2022-07-06vs MonczynskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rasp-Glose / Katalin Mechtler vs Julie la Barbera / Joyce Monczynski7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesValerie Elvin / Shuman Hua vs Michelle Plimpton / Alice Curtiss6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAndrea Abels / Mary-Ann Jolley vs Heather Harmon / Laurie Krajna6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Audrey Cohn
published 4
3.53
Valerie Elvin
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.38
Katalin Mechtler
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Cheryl Athoe
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Kathleen Banks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Dee Dee Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Helen Marlette
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Andrea Abels
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jane Gens
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lisa Abeyounis
published
Mary-Ann Jolley
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Maureen Rasp-Glose
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shuman Hua
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Abeyounis + Audrey Cohn6357% games+6.4% vs expected
Mary-Ann Jolley + Katalin Mechtler6256% games+3.5% vs expected
Kathleen Banks + Katalin Mechtler191946% games−2.1% vs expected
Andrea Abels + Mary-Ann Jolley11357% games−5.3% vs expected
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Katalin Mechtler5252% games−8.0% vs expected
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Audrey Cohn1534% gamesnot enough data
Audrey Cohn + Shuman Hua5158% gamesnot enough data
Mary-Ann Jolley + Helen Marlette4155% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · 6 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Katalin Mechtler
178W–123L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Athoe
91W–75L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kathleen Banks
87W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
3.34
3.5
Dee Dee Fisher
2W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Helen Marlette
20W–17L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Abels
39W–63L career · 6 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
Jane Gens
34W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Abeyounis
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary-Ann Jolley
107W–93L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose
41W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shuman Hua
58W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.